Trust the process, embrace resilience, and understand that challenges often lead to greater success.

Dive into the latest episode of the B2B Go to Market Leaders podcast, where Eli Rubel shares his entrepreneurial journey from tech startups to service businesses. 

Eli details his transition from chasing venture-backed dreams to creating lifestyle businesses that align with his personal values. The conversation spans his decision-making process, the creation of Matter Made and NoBoringDesign, and his newest venture, Profit Labs. 

Eli emphasizes his “tricycle life” philosophy—prioritizing work-life balance while building profitable businesses.

Connect with Eli Rubel on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/elirubel/

Connect with Vijay Damojipurapu on LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/vijdam/

Listen to the podcast here:

From Art School Dropout to GTM Powerhouse: Eli Rubel’s Founder Journey

Signature Question: How do you view and define go to market?

Yeah, sure. So to me, go to market. Very simply put,  would be, you know, what is, what is the motion with which you get your product or offering in front of your ideal customer? Flat out? Like, what are the channels? What are the means, methods, strategies, tactics, yep, all of that kind of in one very.

Cool, yeah, that’s a pretty crisp definition and view for sure. Now let’s double-click and triple-click on some of those things. Yet it all starts with who is your ICP. What are the channels that you’re getting and how you’re reaching them? There’s an entire spectrum of the buyer journey, beyond just adoption and even up to advocacy. 

There is also the internal aspect within either an agency or a SaaS company. It doesn’t really matter. There are a lot of moving pieces. So if you have to double click, and based on your vast experience and perspectives, like, where would you go in deeper in any of those or any other areas?

So when I think about go to market, I think about influence, because at the end of the day, especially with where the market is today, you know, it used to be the case that you could take people through this long buyer journey and kind of build trust over time and like there was enough capital around to fund that type of buyer journey? 

Yeah!

I think now, you know, we’re not It’s not growth at all costs anymore. It’s much more about, how to do we as efficiently as possible. Get someone to make a buying decision. And to me, that comes down ultimately to trust and influence. And so when I think about a go-to-market motion, whether it’s for one of my agencies or for one of our SaaS clients, the fastest path to that, in my opinion, is finding people who are influential, who have an audience that trusts them, and figuring out how to create some sort of win-win situation between us and them, such that they put us in front of their audience. Because either the conversion rates that I’ve seen when that play is successful are so much higher, and then the sales cycles are so much faster than if you’re talking about a traditional kind of full buyer journey, and it’s because you get to piggyback the trust of that individual.

Absolutely, in fact, it’s great and so relevant that you mentioned this exact piece, Eli, because I was actually working with, very closely with an Enterprise, a large enterprise client last week, and one of the key things that I emphasized is, how do you pull in quote-unquote influencers to accelerate your sales cycle? Right? That’s huge. I mean, you guys telling about yourself is one thing, but imagine your customer advocating on your behalf. So it’s a very similar parallel where you bring in an influencer and they show that point of view, or they take that buyer to the next relevant point.

Exactly, exactly, and every category has them right? Like, if you’re selling to Mark, if you’re selling to corporate marketers. Dave Gerhart, exit five, no-brainer, right? If you are selling to SMB tech founders or like Bootstrap founders, Adam Robinson or Santos, right? Like they’re just names that come to mind for pretty much any vert that you might be selling into, or buyer persona.

Yep, absolutely you touched upon all the people that I look up to on my LinkedIn feed every single day, multiple times a day.

Yeah, yeah. I mean, even for me as a go-to-market, practitioner advisor and consultant, right? So for me, it is about how I keep myself up to date and even question my own thinking. So that I can guide my clients and advise them in the right direction.

Totally!

Yeah, the role of influencers is critical, for sure.

And you can kind of follow it makes it easier to follow the general Zeitgeist in that category, right? Like, whatever those folks are talking about, tends to become the language that, like your average middle, middle manager buyers starts to use, because it’s like, okay, or even, or even executive buyers, like, they just, they hear it over and over again, and they’re like, Okay, that’s the cool new language that we should be using. That’s how we talk. That’s how we articulate this challenge or the solution to our you know, ELT and so I think it just makes a ton of sense to align with that fantastic.

Now, this is a great, great opening, for sure. So let’s take a step back, big picture rewind. Walk us through your journey. I mean, your career journey, and what led you to what you’re doing today and who you serve.

Oh, man, it’s a meandering story, so I’ll have to be careful not to let it be too long. But yeah, I mean, I started off as an art school kid, and actually dropped out of art school. I thought I wanted to be a photographer. Spent two years working in the nonprofit space after leaving school, and then I had what I call my quarter-life crisis. I was about 20 years old and realized that you know, I was like waiting tables in Los Angeles, doing the starving artists thing, and realized that that was not going to provide the lifestyle and future that I wanted. 

And so I read The Four Hour Work Week by Tim Ferriss, Yep, got super motivated starting read this was back when what was, this is like 2009, So back when TechCrunch was like everything it put folks in tech like that was, that was the source of truth for what was going on in the startup world. And so started reading Tech Crunch, and I was like, You know what? I’m young enough, I can figure out this software thing. I can figure out the internet. 

So I moved home, moved into my mom’s basement, and set, basically a rule for myself where I wasn’t allowed to leave the basement or move out of the basement until I’d started a tech company. So, yeah, just sat down there. Would go to coffee shops and just bang my head against the wall trying to figure out, how to break into this tech thing, and knowing that I didn’t have any qualifications to be an employee of someone’s company, I had to start something, and ended up starting a Contract Lifecycle Management tool called Glider. 

Raised VC money for that, yeah, and then sold that business in 2014 during my earn-out, I took basically a year off where I was, like, available to them. But it was the case that, like, culturally, my startup and the people who acquired us were like, oil and oil and water. And so thankfully, they didn’t call me very often. I took a motorcycle trip all through Central America, and there were many, many conference calls from inside of my helmet where they had no idea where I was. Is pretty great. And yeah, so that was, that was my foot in the door in tech. 

From there, I acquired an E-commerce business, ran that turned it around over the course of four years, and sold that to a private equity firm in 2019, and then that’s when I got into the crazy world of service businesses and agencies. I started my first agency that serves the tech market in 2019 called Matter Made, a performance marketing and demand efficiency firm lucky enough to partner with clients like Dropbox and Oracle, we created Looms, demand, Gen, org, and programs from scratch. Joe, the CEO, came to us through a trusted advisor of his and was like, we don’t have the demand gen function here yet. We don’t have a demand gen program here yet. Can you create that for us? 

And so we did, Loom.com, hop and product board, bunch, bunch of names that are pretty well-known. We helped them grow that demand through those types of programs. So that was Matter Made. Still is Matter Made, yeah. And then in 2023, I started, I saw this trend, like this was kind of deep in the VC winter, right? No, people were not investing, and budgets were frozen. Hiring, hiring was frozen. And had this thesis that a lot of these companies had just fired their designers, because designers are always seen as, like this, nice to have expense, right? And so I was like, You know what? I’m going to create an agency that lets people work with world-class design talent, but without having to hire them, yeah, and sell into the same audience that Matter Made is, you know, sold into right being like B2B SAAS and yeah, so that, but that that became NoBoringDesign is the name of the agency. We’ve done a bunch of really cool work over the last couple of years. That agency is now as big as my first agency. So yeah, it’s been a fun journey, and actually, I hired a GM to run both of those businesses, so I’m not even in those businesses anymore. I’m starting a third one, which we’re announcing in a week.

Very cool. Oh oh, my God. There are so many segues we can take in your entire journey, very few minutes over here, in the entire journey. So let’s start at the very beginning, right? I mean, college dropout, okay, but that’s fine. I mean, I kind of, and even the audience can relate to it, sure. But then you waited in LA restaurants, I get that too, right? And then you decided, okay, this is not going to get you to where you want to be, big, big, big ambition, big vision, and so on. And then you loved yourself in your parent’s basement, perfect. But then what happened between that point in time and starting Glider?

Yeah, a lot of like, sitting in front of a Moleskine notebook, yeah, at rainy coffee shops in Portland, Oregon, wondering, like, What the hell did I do this? How am I going to do this? What am I going to do? Yeah, first I’m going to put the company in strong air quotes here if you’re not watching the video. So the first company that I tried to start was the easiest way to describe what Squarespace is today. But I had this idea because I had come from art school, and I really knew how hard it was for student artists to get their work online like they had to hire an HTML and CSS like a front-end developer to build them a website from scratch. 

Yeah. 

So I was like, that seems ridiculous. Like, what if? What if we created some sort of templated website builder for student artists? And so I think the idea was great, the vertical was wrong, and I had a really hard time building it, because I didn’t know anything about how to get software built and who to work with, and so I was working with the wrong type of engineers, and I spent maybe six months working on that Before I abandoned it. 

And then after that, I worked on a consumer app that we actually did build, and it was a fully functioning app before I abandoned that, which was, again, kind of come from, coming from the student, artist lens, I was frustrated with this was back when everybody would just like, they’d go on a vacation, and then they’d put their SD card in their computer, and they’d upload every single one of the 500 photos that they took in Mexico to Facebook. 

I was like, Guys, this is, like, there’s this thing called curating your photographs, and it would be really nice if you could do that so we could see the ones that we actually want to see. And so this was, like, an easy way for someone to curate a collection of photographs and tell a story with them. And we had, like, tapped into Facebook’s graph, graph search. And you could search using, you know, plain language, like, Hey, show me all the photos of me drinking beers in Mexico with my friends. And it was like, this was before you could, like, now that’s very normal, but back then, there was no search on top of images. And then from that, you could curate your story. So I think it was ahead of its time in certain ways. And then it was also just like, not really that useful in other ways. But what was interesting about that that really paved the way to Glider, because I networked the shit out of Portland, I was taking as many execs and CEOs and founders out to coffee as I could, yeah, while I was working on that, and ended up throwing like this launch party that a bunch of people came to from the community. 

And so what the feedback that I ended up getting was like, Yeah, we knew this idea was never going to work for you, but it was cool to see how tenacious you were. 

Yeah!

About starting a thing!

Yeah. And they got when you say launch parties. Was it the launch parties for both of those ventures?

Just for the second one, the consumer, yeah. And so shortly after that, I got an email from the only VC in town, and they were like, Hey, you don’t know us yet, but we know you. You know we’ve seen you and we’ve seen you execute. We’ve seen you do this, this project. We think it’s a bad idea, but we would like to have a conversation with you and potentially back you. Some way. And so I went and met with them, and they basically gave me that same speech, like, Listen, if you’re willing to change what you’re working on, we’ll cut you a check right now.

Amazing, that worked on it. 

Yeah. I just want to interrupt that, right? I just want to tie this back to the conversation we started, which is the go to market definition, sure. So many nuggets and insights over here, which is you had the ICP. Initially, it was the students, yeah. After that, it was a consumer, yeah. And then the problem, so the match between the ICP, the problem, the offer, and the business model and the channel didn’t even get into the channel part yet. 

Yeah, right. 

All those things have to align. And doing these things for you, was a huge, a hand learning experience. You had to get through these iterations before you hit your yep, 

yep. Totally amazing. 

Yeah, sorry, I interrupted. Yeah. You were talking about Glider and how it got funded.

Yeah. So, so basically, it was a blank LA was it was a check with a blank idea, right? So they’re like, here’s this check. Let’s collaborate on what the idea is. While I was going through the process of closing that round of funding, I became really fascinated with the friction that was involved in the communication between myself, my counsel, their counsel, and them. It seemed like it should have been a pretty straightforward process, but then we were collaborating on these documents, and it was a little bit convoluted, and it was unclear if we were, you know, who’s looking at the right version of the document, or where do we stand in the process? And so I started to develop this, this question around, you know, is this how all legal document processes go like, is it always this kind of unclear? Yeah. And so I went out and interviewed something like 40 different law firms about, hey, how does this go with your clients? Yep. And the initial thesis was, we would help. We’d be like, a workflow and process engine around legal documents, and we’d sell it to law firms. 

Got it.

And so we started, that’s what we started to build. And we actually that’s what we raised money on. We went when it went out and raised money from True Ventures and a bunch of other folks in Silicon Valley. And pretty quickly we learned that selling to law firms was a really bad idea. But the problem we found was, was actually a problem for sales teams, right? Because they’re, you know, the easiest way to summarize this would be, think PanDa doc today, right? Or Aptus, or any of this kind of last mile of the sales cycle. You’ve got the verbal from the client. You know it’s time to send them the paper. And there’s a bunch of internal and external approvals that need to happen in order to do so. Then there’s negotiations that need to happen, red lines, yeah. And then ultimately, a signature, and then that needs to be routed to the right people afterward, yeah. And so at the time when we were starting Glider, DocuSign and Echo sign only did signature. They didn’t do any workflows. They didn’t do any approvals. It was just like documents finalized already sent for signature. 

And you found all these two-year interviews with the lawyers, the legal law firms, or even with sales teams?

With sales teams as well. Yeah, yeah. And so that’s where we pivoted from trying to sell to law firms. And it was like, Hey, we’re gonna sell to SaaS companies with large sales teams who have struggled with that last mile being a black box for their sellers, and ultimately for their finance teams. 

Nice, and you got them to be like, design customers, and then paid pilots and so on, the initial whatever, the reference customers.

Exactly, yeah, and then pretty quickly, so we were still in the like, we moving through exactly what you just described, you know, design partners, then paid, first paid customers, And right around that time, we had this company reach out to us out of the blue, and they’re like, a 30-year-old company that was one of the larger players in the CPQ space, configure price quote. They had customers like AmEx and Bell helicopters and just Hitachi Data Systems like just big, big old companies as clients, and they didn’t have anything on the contract management side of the house, and so they were, this is when Aptus was really big, and they were just getting beat, eaten alive by Aptus because they didn’t have contract management, yeah. And so they reached out and that the acquisition conversation was actually, it’s its own kind of wild story. I’m happy to go there if you want to. But they basically came in and were like, Hey, we’re gonna give you this cash offer. We need this for our business to thrive. And I had felt like I was pretty tired at that point and had been through quite the journey. And I wanted to get, you know, a base hit this, this was the base hit. 

So, very cool again, just tying back to the entire go-to-market story, which is, in this case, FPX, your acquiring company, I’m thinking, I’m assuming it’s FPX. That’s right, right? 

Right!

And they found a gap in their go to market to the customers, and there they were being eaten alive, better competition, actors and others, yeah, and so you provided that plug for them in their go to market. 

Yep!

Amazing. And yeah, you should actually spend like, a minute or two Eli on that whole acquisition offer, how you went back and forth, and then, yes, you just made the decision after that. 

Yeah, so it took me. It took me a number of years before I was comfortable sharing this story. But now I think it’s hilarious, now that I’ve had some successes afterward, I think it’s hilarious. So we had a technical founder that ended up basically lying about the process, the progress that was being made on the product, and we ended up having to replace him, and we were set back, like 12 months. We had to reboot the whole product with a new team, and so our traction wasn’t aligned to where it should have been based on, you know, the amount of money that was raised and the time we’ve been working on it. 

So when we went out to raise our Series A we just didn’t have the sales. We just started selling. We just started converting accounts to pay, yeah, and so, you know, compared to other series A companies, we just didn’t do, we didn’t look very attractive. And so our VCs were like, listen, it’s been a good it’s been a good try. Like, we’ll, we’ll cut you a check for the next thing you want to work on in a heartbeat. Why don’t we wind this thing down. Call it, call it a day. 

Right.

And, and, yeah, and you can tell us what you want to start next. And so before we had, before I had that conversation with them, they sent me the note like, hey, come to our offices. We want to talk about, you know, the future. And so I knew it was, I knew what the conversation was going to be like, yeah. And this was at the same time that Dreamforce was happening that year. And so I was like, obviously, in quite a depressed state knowing what was coming. I was like, fuck, I need, I just need to keep myself busy up until this meeting, so that I’m not like, sitting there wallowing in my own self-pity.

Right!

And so I just had a bunch of meetings. And one of those meetings that I took was this random corporate development guy from FPX who had sent me a note, and he was like, Hey, I see you’re going to be at Dreamforce. I’d, you know, we’d really like to connect with you. Can you meet for coffee? Like, great, happy to let’s do it. And so I show up to this meeting thinking it’s just going to be this one guy over coffee at the same Regis. And he, he’s like, Yeah, meet me on the whatever, the very top floor, yeah. And so I walk into this room, and the entire executive team for FPX is lining the route, like lining this penthouse suite, in suits. 

And here I am in my like, startup hoodie. Oh, this isn’t what I was expecting. They had, like, catering and so, like, yeah, “tell us about your business”. So I don’t know what got into me. Actually, it’s pretty typical of my personality, but what I did was I was like, You know what? This business is going to get shut down anyway. I might as well just send it with all the confidence in the world. 

Yeah, exactly. 

Why not? Yeah. And so I pitched it. I was like, Yeah, we’re out raising our Series A right now, which was true. Technically, yeah, we’re out-raising our Series A right now. You know, we’ve got all these great design partners that we’re converting into paid all of that was true. You know, here’s the future roadmap for the product, here’s how it’s solving problems. I was just like, really confident and optimistic in this meeting. Gave them a demo of the product. Like, great. Well, we really appreciate you taking the time to share this with us. Nice to meet you. I leave. Go straight to True Ventures offices right from that meeting, have the conversation where, like, hey, let’s spin this thing down. We’ll invest in your next thing.

Right!

And now I’m walking down the stairs of True Ventures South Park office, almost late for my flight, so I’m kind of like, running down the stairs. My phone rings and I answer it thinking it’s my Uber driver, because of a number I don’t recognize. I’m like, I’ll be right there. I’m literally running down the stairs. I’ll be out in front in a second. 

And the other guy’s like, Eli, yes. He’s like, Oh, this is Ron. You were just meeting with us over at the St Regis, yeah. Can you come back? Oh, wow, yeah. I was like. Like, no, I’m late for my flight to Portland. I can’t come back. And he’s like, I really think you should come back. And I’m like, I will miss my flight if I come back. And he’s like, our executive director wants to meet or executive chairman, I can’t remember what her title was, really wants to meet with you. And she’s here right now. It’ll be worth your time to come back. Yeah. And so I’m like, again, I don’t know what got into me, but I was like, fuck it. Yeah, sure. I’ll be there in 10 minutes or five minutes. It’s just so close. So I show up, and this woman is, like, draped in diamonds. I’ve never seen someone wearing so many diamonds. She puts out her hand. She’s like, my name is Audrey, and I buy your company. 

That’s it. 

That’s how she led with that. And I was like, well, it’s not for sale, yeah. And so kind of the same thing. I was like, I don’t know where that came from, but I told her it wasn’t for sale. And she was like, well, it will be by the time you land in Portland. Wow. And that was, that was it. They got, I got, they sent me an LOI, yeah, the next morning. And, you know, typical negotiation process, back and forth, but I got, so I went from the company was for sure gonna get shut down yes, to a cash offer. 

They ended up, I mean, I talk about this publicly, so I’m not sure they ended up buying us for $3 million cash, of which I kept, like 1.2 or something like that, 1.3 which for me, if you think about my story, as I had gone from waiting tables, yeah, it’s huge. Yeah, I was in credit card debt because I used credit cards to start the business before I got VC funding, and then I wasn’t confident enough to pay myself at a market rate, whatever. Anyway, long story short, it was a life-changing event for me, and it ended up opening a lot of doors after the fact, too. 

So an amazing story, and I’m actually so glad that we took the time and you actually shared the story. Eli, I mean, so many reasons, right? One is your mind is always telling you a big lie. The reason why I’m saying this is you think when I say you that your mind is shaping a story in our narrative for yourself, but the world outside will see a different value. In this case, FPX saw a different value for your company versus for you and your investors at the end of the road. Yeah, that’s one. 

And second, is your ability to just it doesn’t matter in what mental state you are. You still need to tell that visionary, the CEO, the founder, story that is key. That definitely played a huge role. And I think one other key takeaway for me and the listeners from the conversation is never to give up. It doesn’t matter how bad or gloomy the situation is, you never know how it transpires. Right? Going back to your previous two companies that you started, you threw a launch party. 

You didn’t have any expectations that you’d get funded by True Ventures for a different venture. Yeah, you didn’t know that totally right? And the same thing with this, it’s an amazing story. I am so glad and thankful that you actually shared this. El.

Yeah, of course!

Yeah, fantastic. All right, and we’re just getting this conversation started. We are just about halfway through that, and so many rich stories out of this. Now go to the next phase of your journey, which is NoBoringDesign, but in between you do your motorbike riding. Maybe that’s a conversation for a different podcast and insights. But going back to, I think you turned into an LP, became an advisor for different companies, and then you also started NoBoringDesign. What is that journey and decision-making like?

Yeah, so I started, it was Matter Made. Was the first company that I started after. Essentially the decision-making was like, you know, I’ve been, I’ve been chasing this dream of starting a massively venture-backed company, taking it public, you know, the typical Silicon Valley trade. And I’d been chasing that now for I think I was 28 so I’d been chasing it for eight years, and I just felt like I knew that I was ready to start a family and have kids, and I felt like I didn’t have the energy anymore, or the drive anymore to chase that dream to the extent that I would need to actually see it through, yeah, and that, to me, I was more interested in creating a lifestyle for that next stage of life, of having kids. And, you know, I called it the tri, the tricycle life, which was this vision that I had of, you know, chasing my kid. They’re they’re on a tricycle, riding down a tree-lined street, then I’m chasing them. 

And it’s the middle of the work week, the middle of the day. I’m not worried about anything, yep. And so I was like, How do I get there? 

Right? Like it does. I don’t need to take a company public to get there. Obviously, that would be one way to do it, but probably wouldn’t have a bunch. Of time and wouldn’t be so carefree, and I know it’d be a long journey. So surely there’s another way. And so that’s where I started thinking about starting a services business, which is what made me a no, boring designer. 

And it came from this kind of lazy place. I like to call it a lazy place, people laugh when I say lazy, that I’m lazy, because whatever I think I’ve always optimized for the most lazy decisions, and they work for me. Other people, they’re like, Dude, you’re not lazy. But anyway, I digress. So I was like, how do I make the most amount of money with the least effort? Yeah, and to me, service business seemed like a great idea, because it’s like, great I get to hire people who are smarter than me, charge more than they’re worth for their time, or not more than they’re worth, but, like, charge more than I’m paying them for their time. Yeah, that’s right, yeah, collect a margin, and I don’t like it, all I have to do is get land for the business, right? Obviously, it’s not as simple as that when you start to scale. 

But long story short, I started this. I started Matter Made with him with the ambition to bring home $40,000 a month. It’s like if I bring home $40,000 a month, that’s like an ungodly sum to me, like, there’s just I couldn’t possibly have any needs beyond that. And so that’s why I created a business model for that. And we got there in six months. 

Wow. 

And then I was like, Oh, shit, this is fun. I guess I’ll keep going. So I ended up scaling that business.

Well, I guess I’ll keep going. So I ended up scaling that business, actually.

Before we went there. So how did you land on the ICP and the problem and develop an offer for that?

Yeah, so the thinking was I have this network in B2B, SaaS, right? Venture-backed. SaaS, yep, from my first thing, and I remember how much I was kind of flying blind and stabbing around in the dark in the earliest phases of my startup journey around go-to-market marketing. 

And so I was like, I definitely could help founders shortcut some of those stumbling blocks that I experienced based on, you know, just based on my own journey. So it’s like, I look, I could look for people who were where I was however many years ago, right? And just help accelerate them, yeah. And so I was like, that’s great. So, like, that’s my ICP is early-stage tech. I’ll leverage my existing network, right? And I’ll help them with marketing and growth, yep. So, yeah. So that was, that was the initial thing. We would create demand gen programs, and then help execute those demand gen programs. And then over, over the years, we refined that into, we’re just really, really good with paid media and helping create the most efficient media programs possible, and that became our niche, and we ended up scaling Matter Made, which still is an agency today, to 4.2 million in profit at its peak in 2021 in three years. 

So that’s kind of like a huge departure from my initial goal of 40k a month in profit. And that’s when I was like, Oh, the agency thing is like, a secret, yeah, it’s kind of like a secret, like, and it’s funny because there’s as a like, I cut my teeth as a founder, like a tech founder, and I remember thinking, agency people are like scumbags. They’re just like, you know, it’s like, it’s like, this dirty word or dirty job, like, ooh, lifestyle business. What’s that? That’s icky. And then what I was on the other side of it, and I was like, holy shit. I like it, I made four times my acquisition price in a single year, you know? And I didn’t. I didn’t do any of the work. It was all just like orchestrating the work.

And were you calling yourself and pitching yourself as an agency in the initial months?

No, in the initial months, I was like a consultant. It started as a consultant, and then pretty quickly I was like, Well, shit, I don’t want to do the work myself. That’s exhausting. So then as then, it became an agency. Once I hired some folks, we got up to about 40 people, yeah. So, yeah, that’s, that’s the that’s the Genesis story of how I, how and why I shifted from tech to services.

Amazing. And then you saw that, you know, it’s quote, unquote, easy money, and you were clearly hitting your goals so easy that something I mean, what transpired you to actually start NoBoringDesign? Yeah, so meta-made.

Yeah. So you use the word easy, and I’m kind of smiling and laughing, not again, easy with quotes I should, yeah, yeah. Well, it’s a good it’s a good segue, because, you know, I think it’s easy to just talk about your wins and your successes, but it’s important to talk about the failures too. So Matter Made peaked in 2021 at 4.2 million in profit. And then all, but all of our clients were tech, every single one of them, yeah. 

And so when the Tech Winter came in 2022, and all the VCs pulled the plea, you know, Sequoia issued what was like their first memo since the first memo they issued back in 2008 right? And so everybody froze their spending and fired all their agencies. So we went from absolutely crushing it, we were my target for that year was 7 million in profit, and we were like, so certain that we were gonna hit that number. And then we went from that to losing $200,000 a month because we had this huge team, and suddenly had very few clients that stuck around through that tech winner.

Right!

And so we went from 40 people down to 5. It was the hardest part, the hardest phase of my career by a landslide, yep. And so I had these two designers on the team that I was basically going to have to fire, and I was like, I really don’t want to, I really don’t want to cut. I mean, I didn’t want to cut anybody, but I just finished cutting 35 other people. So I was like, I wonder if there’s a creative way for me to save these folks, and that’s where I mentioned it at the start of the episode, where I was like, I have this theory that everybody just fired their designers, and so what if we kept them around and created a separate brand and made them available to solve for the folks three months down After firing their designers realize, Well, shit, we actually still need design. 

Great. 

So yeah. So I went to my head designer and was like, Hey, here’s the reality of the situation. I’m willing to get creative and give it a couple of months. 

Yeah! 

Can you create a brand and a website for me in seven days? And so this was on a Thursday or Friday, and by Monday, I had mock-ups, and by the end of that week, it was live. Called it NoBoringDesign, because I could, it’s like, I need a simple name. Something’s very literal. Ended up being a, I think, great name, because…

An amazing name. 

Yeah, you get to use it for Nbd, for short, it’s kind of fun, and people remember it. So anyway, long story short, that’s how it started, and then within the first couple of months, we had landed our first 10 clients, and the business was already profitable. Started hiring other designers, and started building it out that team is now around 30 people, and we’ve just carved out a really great niche, helping both B2B and B2C companies. But really a concentration in B2B Tech stands out. You know, it’s like, how do you, especially in this environment, design ends up design, and ultimately what, what I mean by design is brand and you’re good at the market. It becomes a very cheap lever relative to the other levers, right?

It’s like, okay, I could spend $200,000 a month on Google ads or on LinkedIn ads, whatever it is. And if I look like every other provider that’s advertising, that $200,000 is not an efficient spend.

Correct.

But if I spend half that, and I have a real member, think, think, like a gong, for example, right? Really memorable brand, yeah, if I spend half of that dollar, but I have a really memorable brand that converts better, like I may get the same result, and the investment in the brand is so much cheaper than that, $100,000 every single month.

A huge market product, especially after you have product market fit, it’s huge. 

Exactly. So that’s where we found it. Our niche is helping, helping companies differentiate, and create that moat around their brand, both from, you know, the brand itself, the website itself, but also even like the ads. The creative so, yeah, that’s that there was NoBoringDesign. And now I’m about to launch my third agency. It’s called Profit Labs.

Do you want to give a sneak peek into it? 

Yeah, I’m sure by the time this episode goes live, well, when does this episode go live? 

In about a month. 

Oh, yeah, we’re good. So it’ll be live by then. So profit labs I created because I realized, as an agency owner, and I’ve got a bunch of peers, right, who other folks who have started agencies and services businesses, you know, the financial support that we get is usually from like a generic SMB accounting firm that just they, you know, they do the minimum, they do your books, they give you a P&L and then financial reporting package at the end of the month, and that’s it. But there’s so much more that goes into running an agency and making it profitable. And so I thought to myself, I really want to create an accounting firm, a finance firm that is built exclusively for service businesses, exclusively for agency owners, and helps them run more profitable agencies by surfacing insights that matter to them. Because that’s all we focus on. And so that’s what we’re doing. We help seven and eight-figure agency owners run more profitable agencies. 

Yeah, very cool. It’s almost, I mean, the brand that comes to my mind is like, what Gusto does for small to medium management roles. It’s very similar. You are, like, a fractional accounting and finance for agencies?

100%.

Yeah, very cool. All right, wow. I mean, we covered so much, just an initial part of the conversation. And here I am thinking about how we are yet to get into the meat of the episode, but I think we covered a lot of ground, I still want to dig into this, which is, if you were to go back in time either from your different companies, I think you covered enough from your different companies. But if you were to go back in time and look at your B2B SaaS clients, if you can share a go-to-market success story and a go-to-market failure slash learning story, that’d be amazing for the listeners.

I mean, go-to-market success story, Loom is obviously an easy one to point at, given their ultimate outcome and being there on the ground floor, I think Calm is another like the meditation app, we launched Calm for Work, yeah, Calm for the workplace. It was like B to B to C, and that was a really big success story. Oh, man, what’s a failure story?

I’m sure when you start talking about these two, something will come to your mind, yeah, start with these.

Yeah, yeah. I mean, do you want to dive into the specifics of those, or what? 

Yeah, so either Calm or the first one that you mentioned, which is Loom, yeah, just start, and then I can steer the conversation, sure. 

And I’m gonna preface this with like, a, this was almost five years ago now, four years ago now. B, I didn’t do any of the work, so these are my teams that were, that were working on these accounts, yeah, so it’s gonna be hard for me to go into like, specifics. 

Got it? Okay? 

I think I could, yeah, go ahead. 

Let’s actually start with, I mean, when you had the initial discovery, call the conversation with either Loom or Calm, what is it like? And then how did you and your team come up with what the engagement would look like and outcomes for the next three, six months? 

Yeah. So for both of them, we were basically walked into those deals by an advisor to the CEO, who had already worked with us and seen the results that we produced. For other folks, they were advising, yeah, and had whispered in the CEO’s ear essentially, like, hey, you need this, you know, you need this help, right? These are the experts. You know that you can trust them because I’ve seen their work in the past. Like, let’s get this done. Let’s get this solved. 

And so unlike other sales cycles, where we were starting from, you know, scratch and building trust and authority, that was kind of, I think my first meeting with Joe was like, here. He was like, here’s the lay of the land. We don’t really have anything. We just hired our first demand-gen person. But we don’t really, like, we don’t have any direction for them. We need someone who can come in and set the strategy, oversee the hires, oversee the work, and get us on the right track. Like, we’re not just, like, very, very early, early, early. And that’s that was, you know, at the time, that was the type of challenge we liked. We don’t do that anymore. We don’t work with the early stage anymore, but at the time, that was like so much fun, right? Blank slate. 

And, yeah, yeah. 

Yeah, got it okay, and they were at about a few 100k or even a million in revenue back then.

I don’t remember, but yeah, they hadn’t whatever revenue they were producing was not because they were marketing and doing demand.

Yeah, and the fact that they had the first demand gen, which most likely would be like a senior individual contributor, but they didn’t have the budget, not the need yet for like, a full-time director or VP of demand.

Yeah. And, I mean, I think, I don’t think Joe would correct me on this, but, like, I don’t think Joe would have known, like, he didn’t know what he needed or, like, what the roles would be, or how to get that set up like he was a green founder. You know, that’s not a dig. That’s just like how it is. I was a green founder at one time, too. So, yeah.

Fair enough. And then what was like, the first big, aha, big success that you delivered for Joe in demand, Gen.

This is where my memory is, like…

That’s okay. If it’s easier to talk about Calm, we can do that,

yeah. I mean, they’re all from the same era. 

Or we can move to NoBoringDesign on you, yeah?

Like a short version for Loom. I remember we did Loom. It was, it’s funny, Loom and Calm were both Loom, Loomfor the workplace, Calm for the workplace. And it was like a video series that we CO produced. We brought in this video team that we really like. We created these, like, really fun, kind of funny videos of someone using Loom to communicate in the workplace, kind of share the value proposition and illustrate. Because, you know, now, Loom is practically a verb, but back then, nobody knew what it was, so we had to introduce the concept of, like, why would you send a video message that also allows for screen sharing? Like, how is that valuable?

Right! 

And I remember that campaign just did super, super well, and that was kind of like the spark, the initial start off, like, okay, we’re onto something. Let’s chase this. Let’s chase this thread.

Absolutely. I mean, I love loom. I mean, I use Loom even to this day, and I’ve been using it for a few years now, and I still recall that maybe it was from the campaign, or from a different one, where the employees at Loom were actually talking about how they use loom, both internally for their status or weekly updates to the team, or even for sales calls. Yeah, yeah. Amazing. This is great stuff, and I’ll just make it easy on you. Eli, I know we covered a lot of go-to-market failure stories, so let’s not go there throughout a lot for sure. But yeah, as we come towards the end of this conversation and podcast, a couple of questions I have for you. One is if you were to go back in time and then look at, or think about, like, two, three, or four people that really played a big role in shaping and really pulling you up from your deepest points or most down points. Like, who were those people?

I think the VC who first came to me with that, you know, vision of what I could be and could do when I was still working on the stupid thing. Her name’s Angela Jackson. She’s, I’ve shouted her out many times before because she was really that first spark for me, the first kind of win-win in my sails, if you will. And then now, now that I have, you know, a little bit more years under my belt, I’ve started to even go back further than that and realize I have this friend. His name’s Rob Mizell and he and I met in photography school, and he was the one who told me that I had to read The Four Hour Work Week and a couple of other books too, that just like, absolutely changed the course of my life. So I think he, gets an absolute mention there as well. Yeah, and then yeah, there were, I mean, there are a lot of folks along the way. Timothy Young, who was the he found very successful founder, then the president of Dropbox, and now the CEO of Jasper. He was an advisor to my first company, to Glider, and just along my career has been a pretty pivotal person and a great support system, and just a great guy and friend and oh man, the list. The list goes on but we’ll leave it at that. I think that those folks at least encompass the vast majority of the beginning of my journey. 

Fantastic, great. So two questions, the last two questions. So. Wow. The one question that I wanted to get your thoughts on was, how do you think about launching Profit Labs, and what did you have to create, like, a point of view or a manifesto, and why did you come into existence? And what is your vision like? If you can walk us through that thought process? 

Yeah, I love it. So Profit Labs, the accounting firm and financial services firm for agency owners, the way that I do at this point, I kind of have a playbook for launching a services business. And the playbook is pretty straightforward. I need to absolutely identify who the influential cogs are, right, not cogs, but like, I think of it as, like, an influence map. 

So who are, who are the players who, if they buy in, or if they talk about me, especially if multiple folks within that world talk about me, that it’s just going to absolutely 10x our growth from what it would be if, if, if I wasn’t interacting with them.

Yeah. 

So that’s the first thing, and start networking with them, figuring out, like, what is the angle, what’s the win, win. Then cold email still works. It doesn’t work as well as it used to, but it still works and so, and I think there are interesting ways that I use that in the funnel. So, for example, I have a newsletter called profit labs weekly, where I share tips and strategies for agencies and service businesses to see how they can be more profitable. 

How can they produce more profit? And I give away a bunch of free resources and models and spreadsheets for all these things. And so I’ll use cold email to promote that. So instead of being in someone’s inbox, asking them for a meeting and pitching my shit. I’m just reaching out to these folks, but hey, most agency owners struggle with profitability. They struggle to be as profitable as they believe they should be. Here’s a free resource. Let me know if you have questions and just kind of bleed with giving. And it’s a pretty common phrase at this point, but it works. So, you know, eventually, then drip them closer to the offering itself. So cold email is another big one. And candidly, between those two things, like, if you’re starting a business like that from scratch and you just did those two things, yeah, that’ll get you to the first 20 customers. No problem. 

Absolutely, no, for sure. I mean, even though you call it cold email, that’s not really cold email, it’s actually a newsletter where someone has to opt into it, yeah, and yeah, nurture drip, offer value. And me, personally, I’ve subscribed to so many newsletters I’ve become attached to that founder’s thought process and bought products and services and coaching.

Totally, absolutely.

And that thing works.

Yep, absolutely! 

Yeah, great. 

So final question, if you were to go back in time and go back to day one of your go-to-market journey, what advice would you give to your younger self? 

Hmm, trust the process.

Simple, that’s it. Yeah, amazing, yeah, trust the process, yeah, and especially given what you just shared with me, Eli, and if I were to put myself in your shoes, only at a surface level, that’s all I can do, right? Like when your friend told you, hey, go read The Four Hour Work Week book. 

Yeah.

Versus you waiting at LA Tables restaurants and then deciding, hey, you know what? This is not it. I’m going, I need to start from the ground up and figure out what that is, all the different failures, and then somehow a higher power, or whatever, is actually helping you connect the dots, which you will not see it. Yeah, right. That’s how I see, I mean, and you aptly put it right across the process, you never know, but as long as you’re just putting in the reps. Yeah, I really feel that. Okay, this is the right thing to do. Yep, you don’t know. You don’t know the outcome, but it’s what it is.

Totally! 

It’s important to price for customers, not just the product itself, as humans ascribe value.

Dan shares his career journey, starting as a software engineer and transitioning into product management and eventually pricing consultancy. He emphasizes the critical role of pricing as a strategic lever in successful B2B SaaS go-to-market strategies, drawing on his extensive experience helping companies overcome common pricing challenges.

Dan provides valuable insights for B2B SaaS leaders looking to leverage pricing as a key component of their go-to-market efforts.

Connect with Dan Balcauski on LinkedIn

Connect with Vijay Damojipurapu on LinkedIn

Listen to the podcast here:

Pricing as a Strategic Lever in B2B SaaS Go-to-Market: Insights from Pricing Consultant Dan Balcauski

Let’s get this rolling. So the first question, which I ask my guests, or my guests, is, how do you view and define go to market?

It’s an interesting question. Honestly, I don’t have a whole lot of use for the term, because go to market tends to be very vague and broad. When I hear people talk about it refers to sales and marketing functions in general, the way I sort of wrap my head around it, I think a lot more about like we have these roads here in Texas, your listeners who may have never visited the area, but we’ve got FM, 2222 and RM, 2342 so FM stands for Farm to Market, and RM stands for ranch to market. So these are the roads that the ranchers and farmers use to bring their products to the city to sell. So to me, that’s kind of where my head goes whenever I hear the term go to market. Like, what are the actual pathways and mechanisms that your product from creation, from the ranch or the farm into your customer’s hands?

I love it. I mean FM and RM. And you give us a little primer. So for all of us tech sense, who are not familiar with this road naming, terminology. It’s a fun thing, and I like the way you used it. Dan, it’s a pathway. I mean, farmers, and ranchers, have a quote, unquote products, and B to B. SaaS companies, they have their products now figuring out their pathway to get to the market. And that’s go to market. I love that. That’s a good take, interesting take, for sure, yeah, but clearly, I mean, there’s so many levers, so many variations, so many challenges when it comes to taking a product from an idea or a concept to the market. I mean, there are aspects around who is this product for. What kind of problems is this product solving, and what is it not that’s more of the external view, the competition view of the market dynamics, and so on? 

And then there’s an internal arg related, right? Right? And there’s also the alignment, which you did allude to briefly earlier, which is between product and marketing and sales. And if it’s a SaaS kind of business, you’re talking about customer success as well, typically. So your thoughts, having worked with organizations of different scales and in different industries.

I’m sorry, there was a long Prelude, but I missed the question in there. What is the question about? Like, where do people struggle with alignment?

Yeah, so from your vantage point, having worked in different industries and with different customers’ products, what are the little nuggets that you caught to the different things that I talked about, like the external aspects of go to market, and then the internal aspects of go to market. Any thoughts?

Well, you know, I mean, there’s, I have a lot of thoughts. I’m not sure exactly where you were. You were hoping to go with that, but in many ways, there are often as many internal problems as there are external problems in these companies, right? And so, you know, often, you know, one way to kind of just at a very high level describe what I do is like, Well, have you ever seen what’s on a SaaS pricing page? We’ve got to get to that answer, right? That would be the most succinct way to describe what I do, right? And so you think about, okay, well, that’s communicating a lot of things, right? And so a customer sees that and what do they understand? And what does that mean for them? 

Getting to that right? It’s because the problem tends to be that everyone maybe has a view at the executive table of what that should look like, except the Venn diagram of all their views do not overlap at all. So getting that internal alignment tends to be the real beauty challenge that I think a lot of people under-emphasize, or maybe it goes it comes as a surprise. So hopefully, you know this conversation could clear that up a little bit.

Yeah, no, absolutely. So let’s take a bigger picture. Let’s just zoom out a little bit, and if you can share with our listeners your career journey, like day one of your go-to-market journey, and the trajectories and paths that you have taken and what led you to what you’re doing today if you can share that.

Yeah. So I’ve spent my entire career to this point in the software world. I started more on the value creation side than the value capture side. So I started as an engineer, building products in and into engineering management, into product management. Ultimately, when I was a coder, I made the realization that the computer didn’t care how angry I got at it, it still wouldn’t run my code. And so I realized it probably was not the end result for B I became much more fascinated by how we created value for our customers and how that turned into dollars and cents for the business. 

And so ultimately pursued my MBA, and I spent a good chunk of my career on the product management side, increasing levels of seniority there. And, you know, I was very lucky when I was doing my MBA to be at a place where I found this out much later. But a lot of business schools don’t even have courses on pricing. Mine did. So I took, I took a lot of them there, not thinking that I’d end up having career pricing, just because I thought it was interesting, and then got thrown into the real world during my internship. I had an internship for a very successful Silicon Valley startup during my MBA program, and it was, it was like a blended product marketing, product management role, and one of the problems on the CEO’s desk was whether should do a freemium approach for their product and reselling sort of consumer apps through this sort of channel? 

And so, among several things, I worked on that summer. So I got my thrown in the deep end there. And then, you know, anyone who spend any time and either the product marketing side or product management side knows that, you know, sort of Batman and Robin. I’ll let you choose which is which, but they’re tied at the hip very close. And so while the organizations I wasn’t I was in the product management didn’t explicitly own pricing. We were a critical stakeholder. But what I found is a lot of my product marketing counterparts would be like, I’m really good at, like, doing content and messaging and positioning work. I don’t know if you have a business degree. Can you help out with this? So, you know, I made mistakes along the way but got pulled into those conversations. And, you know, over time, I finally took the leap and decided to get off of my own. Been running my consultancy project, really, for the last six years now, which is a little bit mind-boggling to say. Interesting.

Yeah, interested my journey is somewhat similar, at least in the early stages, where I started off as a software developer, and I love the way you framed it, which is the compiler didn’t really like the way you coded, and that’s a signal you Okay, something is off, and maybe you need to change paths. And so, yeah, so similar path where I started off as a software developer, and then went and did my MBA, and came back to Bay Area and did the different roles, product management, product marketing, the exact ones that you have been alluding to. And so for me, I was where, since I had a very quantitative, analytical background and a mindset, I was also gravitating more and more towards the product marketing side of things versus the product management side of things. This is where I started seeing that interesting friction, where I am better at Product Marketing compared to product management, but I don’t have any say when it comes to pricing, it typically goes to product folks. That’s what I’ve seen. So do you see that? I mean, that’s is that? How do you see it as well Dan? 

Well, I think one of the difficulties of running my current business is that there is not a consistent owner of pricing across B2B software companies. Yeah. So, you know, in as much as we like to talk about customer personas, etc, it makes it very difficult for me to create that because it’s like. Oh, the CRO owns it in this company. The CMO owns it in this company. The Chief Product Officer owns it in this company, and the head of the VP of Product Marketing owns it in this other company. Usually kind of the split I see, and it’s all about evenly split between those groups, I would make the argument that I think product marketing should own it. The product is not a bad place to own it. And just simply, the reason why is because I view pricing as a function of positioning, and usually product marketing is at least the keeper of positioning, if not the outright owner. They’re usually at a strategic level in the business. They’re keeping an eye on the competition. They’re very keyed into what the key messages are that are resonating with customers. And so it’s a natural place for it to fall from a strategic mindset. I generally disagree with having someone like Sales own it. You do not want to have, say, Dracula in charge of the blood bank. The incentives are not aligned in that case. No disrespect to my friends in sales, they have a very difficult job. But you also want to make sure that you’re balancing the short and long-term interests of the business as a whole in that strategic pricing function. But the product is really well suited to own it. The problem with the product is usually, I mean, they’ve got a million other things on their plate, and so they just don’t have the time to dedicate to give it sort of the rigorous treatment that it probably should in most cases. That’s probably the biggest flaw of having it in the product organization.

Yeah, fair enough. And looking at your LinkedIn profile, yeah. So after your MBA, you did, or during your MBA, you did your summer internship, and that’s where you found your calling towards pricing looks like. And then you went to solar events, did the product management, and grew up the ladder. So if you can share your experience and stories from SolarWinds.

Yeah, I mean, there’s a lot of experience there. So, you know, one of the things that was interesting about SolarWinds is it was, you know, it’s a software business. First of all, when everyone hears the term, they immediately think it is like, Oh, do you guys do renewable energy or some sort? No, no, it’s a software business.

The company, it’s funny because it’s now just, actually, within the last week, changed hands again to another private equity firm. It IPOs, it goes private, and IPOs goes private, and it just went through another transaction. However, the company itself operates very much like a private equity firm. It looks like a software business, but while I was there, we were acquiring three to five companies a year and tucking them into the broader portfolio. 

And so what would happen is we would buy a whole company, slot it into our go-to-market model, and most of that team would sail off into the sunset with their giant bags of cash. And then, you know, as a product leader, you know, at any one time, I was managing between two and four products simultaneously, that all had been separate companies. So it was a very interesting experience to get a lot of reps of seeing what early stage companies, you know, the good and the bad around product management, around product marketing, because you inherit a lot of those decisions, and then have to, you know, make them work in The new system. And so very excellent experience. You know, it was kind of a rocket ship when I was there, but, but, yeah, many of those times where, you know, I was helping to plan the Hey, what is the, what is the feature roadmap? 

How are we going to sell this thing, etc? But then, you know, having getting pulled in on these pricing conversations, because there’s, you know, Product Marketing counterparts, very smart, but kind of to that to that point before, right? It’s not that, again, who should own it, product management, product marketing, sales, like very few people, if you go through a product management training, either through pragmatic or any number of places, very rarely have a pricing component, right? 

You go through a product management thing, and they teach you, alright, here’s what Agile is. Here’s how to write JIRA tickets. Here’s how to do some customer discovery and product marketing. You know, very rarely are they getting actual, real explicit training and pricing. So I think it’s kind of, you know, it doesn’t say anything about the people. I think it says about pricing as a function. It’s still relatively nascent for most folks. So, yeah, there’s a ton of stories I could go into, like, while I was there, not sure where you want

Yeah, I’m really curious, like, at what point in time, or was that like a phase that actually called you out or pulled you into the pricing aspect?

Yeah, let me well, you know, I had a bunch of different sort of sporadic experiences along, you know, both the journey, sort of when I was in my internship, as well as, you know, solar winds and beyond. So. So after spending years as a product leader in SaaS, I took a year and a half sabbatical to go travel the world and amazing reset. But as I was traveling, I kept on asking myself, what’s next? I thought I’d start a product company, but couldn’t lay an idea. I truly believed in but I didn’t believe in myself, so I started looking at what others were doing in the consulting space. That’s when I noticed something. I started seeing a growing trend of fractional CFOs, CMOs, and even chief legal fractional components. So, no one was talking about a fractional Chief Product Officer. So I thought, either this is a brilliant opportunity or a terrible idea. It turned out to be a terrible idea because I quickly ran into a fundamental problem. 

So, like, product is the crown jewel of a tech business. All right, so think of it. You know, product management, Microsoft was the first people to have, I think the product manager. I think they call them program owner titles at first, where they brought it over, but they borrowed the concept from the CPG companies like Procter and Gamble, and you’re the leader who had brand managers, 

Right.

Well, the brand is the core asset of a CPG company. The tech and product are the core assets of a technology company. And so it’s not like finance or marketing, where a lot of early technical teams view, you know, maybe those functions, as you know, purely operational plug-in roles. So CEOs aren’t generally looking for consultants or advisors to own their product strategy. If they do think they have product strategy issues, they’re looking to fire their current CPO and hire their full-time replacement to solve it. So, you know. So I was, I was out there with this positioning, you know. And I think, you know, like anything else, it’s very difficult to sort of understand what real market demand looks like until you’re sort of out there doing it. And you know, I was taking on different consulting projects, and your thing kept coming up, which was pricing. 

And you know, even I did this kind of intermediate pivot where I was kind of focused more specifically on retention, but then I saw a lot of poor pricing and packaging were at the root of a lot of customer churn issues. And something else, I started getting inbound interest, asking people, asking if I could help them with pricing. You know, even though I wasn’t sort of explicitly, sort of pushing that and, you know, realized that a van was there, and I realized, you know, the market wasn’t looking for this fractional CPO. They were actively seeking help with their pricing and decided to make the pivot. And so, you know, just because something makes sense to you, I think the lesson here is, you know, it doesn’t mean there’s demand for it, you know. But you know, people don’t wake up thinking, I need someone to help me with my product strategy, but their CEOs do wake up thinking we’re leaving a lot of money on the table with our pricing. And I learned that, you know, pricing is a problem. Customers are willing to bring in outside expertise to solve so that’s how I ended up leaning into the pricing. 

Yeah, thank you for sharing that. I mean, I was not actually planning to cover this, but I think you added a lot of value. And the reason why I want to emphasize this to our listeners, especially is a lot of times, especially folks coming from the product world, they always think when they hear the word or term product market fit, it’s typically in the concept of like a SaaS product and a market fit. But in your case, what you shared, and this goes to any other services and even fractional folks or solopreneurs, even if there is no software product component to what they’re looking to offer. 

At the end of the day, they still have to figure out, quote, unquote, the product piece as service packaged as a product, right? And this is where you had to go through the different iterations to figure out. You enter the original thesis and positioning of a fractional Chief Product Officer, which was your quote, unquote product. I mean service as a product or product as a service, right? But that was not the case, and you had to go through those same iterations that any startup is more familiar with. I mean for folks, typically, when they think about startup founders, they think about like software or software products, but it’s the same thing, right? Even for fractional and services, people to figure out their product market fit, they had to go through the same iterations.

Yeah. Service market fit, right? It would be the same plugin thing. Yeah, you’ve, you’ve got to find a pain point that people are, you know, looking to actively bring in folks to help solve and, you know, I there’s definitely, I could add layers to that story. I think one of the things that you know, maybe is counterintuitive, but if there’s, there are other folks who are, who are trying to go down this, like this was an interesting tweak that I had to use because I’d spent a bunch of time in product roles doing customer discovery right. And so one of the one of the things that you do in those types of conversations is really trying to understand, hey, what are the what are the top pain points those people are trying to deal with in their current roles? 

Yeah, um. So the early mistake I made when I was, you know, trying to do that as it applied to that business was, although I might be properly identifying the top issues that that senior executive is, Chief Product Officer, Chief Customer Officer, whatever it might be is, is dealing with that doesn’t necessarily mean that they want to bring in someone from the outside to solve it. 

So this was a big problem with looking at something like customer retention, because, you know, maybe the Head of Customer Success, or chief customer officer actually owns that, but that’s, that’s also why they’re there. So, you know, it’s, it is one of these nuances, right? I mean, and you could hopefully that’s valuable, as folks sort of think about, like, Okay, well, people keep telling me as a pain point, but they’re not spending money on it, or they’re not hiring my, you know, a big fan of jobs to be done. I use it a lot, right? So you’re hiring a person or hiring a product, yeah, you know, it’s like, okay, why are they not hiring my product to do this job for them? It’s like, oh, because this is something that they don’t want to be. They don’t. They’ve been hired to do that themselves, right? So, so, you know, a lot of lessons learned there. And again, I don’t say to folks that it’s impossible to go out there and do fractional, cheap product officer, just that I was not smart enough to figure out the way to make that compelling. 

Well said, Yeah, well, said, and then you transitioned and went on your own path, and you created product tranquility. That’s the name of your company. So if you can share like, who are your ICPs and what is the recurring theme or pain point, why people keep coming back to you and your services?

Yeah, so we work with, I would say, primarily, B to B. Scale up, B to B. SaaS companies scale up in like the 20 to 50 million ARR range, typically for CEOs, founders, and their executive teams. These companies are past the kind of startup phase, but they’ve really sort of got some amount of repeatable model. The products hit a certain level of maturity where they are starting to deal with issues, like they’re maybe going after new customer segments that they weren’t before, or their product has gotten to a level of complexity where it needs to be divided up into multiple different kinds of offers or tiers, right? Maybe they’ve just been sort of adding one size fits, and they keep on adding and adding, and they’ve got a, you know, a big, you know, thing that does a lot, but it’s very difficult to explain, or, you know, maybe certain segments of their customers often don’t value and so you end up having to do unnatural things with discounting in order to fit things into deals, etc, because you don’t, you don’t have the right fit for different kind of customers that you’re now covering. 

Also, at this point, you may become a Multi-Product, either organically or inorganically. And so ultimately, what folks see is that there’s a lot of these pricing and packaging issues ultimately are negatively affecting ARR and net revenue retention, especially. And so, you know, help them get clarity on who their customers are. Do a lot of work around your segmentation, and how they communicate their value. Do you know what alternative understanding, what alternatives customers are concerned about? Alternatives customers are considering, and how do you know the structure, pricing, and packaging?

Understood. So let’s make it even more concrete. So and so for with each of my guests, I asked them to share a success story and a failure story in the go-to-market space. And this actually makes it even more concrete for the listeners in terms of the nuances, the challenges, and how people overcame in their expert area. So if you can share a success story and a failure story, and then talk about your pricing approaches in that context, that’ll be great, Dan.

Yeah, so I’ll actually give you a two-for-one because it’s a failure, but also a success. I generally believe, right? If I look at a tree, I don’t criticize the tree because of all the directions it didn’t grow. I only look at the tree in its hole. So we are we’re always finding a bunch of things that don’t work in order to find ways that do so. I say one of the most common mistakes I see a lot of SaaS companies make is treating pricing as an afterthought, something to figure out, like right before launch, rather than an integral part of their product planning process. So I work with a company who has built a new product. Like many companies, pricing wasn’t a priority until they were kind of deep in the launch process, and so six months before launch, the head of product needs to put together an executive update deck. They get to the pricing slide and think, Well, we charge X for our current product, so we. 

Put 2x the on the new one, so no research, just a number on the slide. Yeah. So fast forward four months. Everyone’s been seeing this 2x number in their weekly exec updates. Now they’re two months from launch, and someone asked, like, Hey, we’re launching soon. Like, how confident are we in this pricing? And the Team suddenly realized, well, not very. They had just thrown a number on his slide, like, six months earlier. No real research behind it. So that’s what they end up calling me. And so there’s like, here’s where this gets interesting, like, so we go, we do the market research and find out that the market is actually willing to pay 4x, like, double what they planned. Oh, great. Great news. Yeah, right, but not, not for me. 

So what shocked me was the internal reaction. So despite 2x being, you know, completely arbitrary, the executive team had become emotionally anchored to it. They were, like, uncomfortable with the idea of charging, you know, 4x more than you know they’re or actually double more than their customers would have been, right? And so it’s a perfect example I see all the time where, you know, we think business decisions are purely rational, but you know, humans have interesting relationships with money. So that’s when I realized something important. So you know, pricing anchoring isn’t just a customer issue. It happens internally too. So even though, you know, the original price point had no basis in research, you know, it had been repeated in internal meetings for six months, you know, everyone had unconsciously latched onto it as reality. So I presented a much higher point that was supported by market data. Instead of seeing it as an opportunity, the first instinct was skepticism, Oh, it’s too big of a jump. 

You know, our customers don’t pay this much and, and what you’ll find is, like, in those situations, like, you’ll just, you’ll attack the research, like, what? Okay, well, now everyone becomes, like, a pricing methodology expert, of like, well, yes, dig it. Yeah, exactly right. And you’re like, you’re like, wait. Like, what do we like, we’re arguing against pure arbitrariness, like how we actually would have done the research. And I was like, well, that methodology is flawed when, yeah, the problem is, is, like, you’re the original thing was just pulled out of a hat. So, so, but somehow you can’t question that part. So, so pure anchoring bias at play? You know, just like, I’m sure everyone should ask your parents. I am sure they tell you exactly how much a gallon of gasoline was when they started driving, right? And that’s the price it should be, right? You know, the gas today is so expensive. When I got my first car, it was only 49 cents a gallon, right? And so, you know, I guess what, you know, I learned a bunch of that experience. You know, the first is that your pricing is just about data. It’s a lot about psychology. 

And, you know, if you don’t prepare, you know, not only consumer psychology, which I think it’s a lot of the attention in, you know, the, you know, there’s, there’s plenty of stuff around, like, Why do you have all these anchor prices, etc, get the $2,000 bottle of champagne on the price list, right, but, but you know, you also have that internally in the stake stakeholder. And if you don’t prepare stakeholders well for unexpected results, they’ll reject them. Attack the methodology, attack the messenger. So now, when I work at companies, you know, I make sure to ask them upfront. You know, it’s like, hey, like, if we go do this, if we come back showing customers will pay 3x or 4x more, what would you do or asking them, like, hey, like, where do you think the reasonable range will be? 

As you’ll learn a lot about where folks’ heads are at right up front, that’ll help you prevent some of, those surprises, and that conversation before the research starts is crucial. And I think you know, ultimately, you know that’s sort of within that you know, particular domain of, you know, anchoring, within the building. But I think that you know, the real lesson here for folks as well is that pricing is not something you figure out two months before a launch, right? It’s part of the product development process itself. And so if you wait until launch the test pricing, you run the risk of this, you know, these internal assumptions becoming, you know, gelling like concrete before anyone has done any actual work. And that can be as difficult as anything else, right? There’s those, those biases and those anchors are really quite powerful.

Great start.

Yeah, in fact, couple of thoughts, I’ll let you drink a sip of water, but you shed a lot of nuggets over there along the way, Dan, and a couple of thoughts come to my mind. Is so similar to when I was in my role as a product marketer. I typically played the role of taking on the ownership for beta program definition as well as recruiting, and I’m talking about a version one product, so at least in that environment, I could get the buy-in and. Part of the executors, the product leaders, and the marketing leaders. Product marketing has to be involved from the concept stage, especially when it comes to positioning and messaging. That was relatively easy. 

But then I also took the extra step of figuring out, okay, we are looking to launch a product, but how do we know how much your customers are willing to pay for that? And that’s where I also did pricing validation and pricing experimentation during and with the beta customers doing the beta program. So that’s something that I did. And going back to your point, I’m completely on board, 100% with you that folks should be thinking about pricing from day one when the product idea and a concept are being really thought about and people are going to invest in building a product not one or two months before a launch. That’s super.

Yeah, yeah. 

And so, president, why do you think pricing is overlooked? I mean, at least people are getting around and pulling in forks for the positioning and messaging piece is what I’m seeing. But the pricing piece is still a great area.

It’s a great question. I have hypotheses. So you know, on the P and L, you’re going to have all your expenses of the business, yeah, the, you know, CTO is going to get the bill from AWS, you know, how much your engineering salaries cost, right? You know, but that revenue number at the top, you know, it. Uh, you know, it’s price times quantity. Everyone just sort of, I think their eyes glaze over. They don’t think about they think it’s just that prices as a constant. For the most part, there is a lot of focus on acquisition. So changing the, you know, p times q, there’s a lot of focus on the Q, Yeah, gotta get more leads. 

Gotta gotta write more people in the funnel. Yeah. And you know, why is that? I think you know, one is pointing back to what I was talking about before. A lot of folks kind of view pricing as black magic, Voodoo. And so if you know, I don’t know it’s sort of working, and I don’t know how to make it any better, and I don’t think anybody else does either. So if it ain’t, you know, don’t, don’t touch it, right? I don’t even know if it’s broken, so I’m just gonna leave it. I’m gonna leave it alone. And so they don’t really, you know, when you look at that P and L, right, you don’t see that your opportunity cost is a line item, like, well, you know, if you were priced correctly, right, instead of your revenue being x, it could have been 10x. Doesn’t show up on the P and L. And I would hesitate if any accountant actually put that on the P and L. 

I don’t think that they’re necessarily in the best position to make that forecast, either. And you know, but I would say, you know, the misconception there is, there is a lot more science than it is a black box. There’s definitely some art to it. As any marketer knows, humans are squishy, right? We have psychological things. We respond to certain words in certain ways, right? And you know your colors are gonna drive different you know, amount of conversion, call to action clicks, right? But you know, we know that there’s no reason why the green button versus the orange button, why the green should win, but for some reason it does. 

And so, yes, there is, there is an, you know, an art to it as well. But there’s a lot of science, and I think just folks have not been, you know, as educated on the science, and also, right? It’s this, it’s this hidden opportunity cost. So it’s just kind of out of sight, out of mind. And then, you know, if you don’t have a lot of folks who have done it before, or, you know, they’re not getting pushed to really look at it, then it can be, you know, it can be a blind spot.

Yeah. And it’s interesting, right? I mean, people experience a product and a price variation depending on so many factors. So taking an example that each and every one of us can relate to, it takes a cup of coffee, and the same cup of coffee in a 711 has one price point. The same cup of coffee in a cinema hall will have a different price point. The same cup of coffee at events or even in the airport will have a completely different price, the same product, and it all boils down to how much that customer is willing to pay in that scenario.

Exactly. Value and willingness to pay are relative and contextual. They are not an absolute. Is not like Planck’s constant out in the universe, where we could just scientifically measure it. It is a it is a measure of desire, right? And that desire is framed by, you know, my needs at the time and the other alternatives I have available to me.

Yeah, completely. And I would imagine those are the things that you would do in your research, part of your customer research, as to come up with here is a price point, and this is what is backed, does the data that backs that recommendation? Is that a fair statement, Dan?

Yes, correct. And so, you know, there’s, there’s a lot of different, you know, methodologies we could talk through in terms of, you know, ways that you get pricing data and ways that we validate that, et cetera. One of the things that, whatever sort of methods you use, one of the things we were just hinting at, is that value is relative to the there’s there’s no external arbiter of value. Value isn’t valued like beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And so, you know, the first mistake that we make in the idea of pricing our product is pricing our product versus pricing our customers the product. The product is just a thing. It’s just, it’s inert, it’s bits, right? It has no, it has no value. Human, the humans ascribe the value. 

Maybe someday our AI overlords will ascribe the value, but for the purposes now, like we humans ascribe the value, yeah. And so in order to do that, we want to better understand our customers. And so when we look at, you know, whatever methodology you choose to defend, western, a conjoint, or any number of other ways you may think about framing pricing questions, one of the insights that we are most valuable coming out of there is, what are the dimensions that discriminate customers that value this a lot versus those that don’t value it? 

Uh, you know, or value a little or not at all. 

Yeah!

Right, because those are oftentimes just as important because we want to always spend time, you know, anyone who’s done marketing for any amount of time, all leads are not created equal. Some people have high urgency. Some people have no urgency. And like the sales guys, they love it when you give them a high-urgency customer, they hate it when you give them a no-urgency customer, right? So it’s better for the business. It’s better for everyone. If we target our entire go-to-market lever at the people who most need our product. And so even if around the edges we say, well, okay, we can’t get nine digits of precision of how much this person would pay for this product, but you know what, we could see giant bands between groups, and that’s going to affect which markets we go after first, where we spend our marketing dollars, the positioning, you know that we have, we’ve we get only so many messages we could put on the homepage. Yes, right? The ones that we’re going to put are the ones that want to be increased, are willing to pay more, and also the ones that resonate with the people who say they value this the most. And so that pricing data can be useful throughout the entire go-to-market funnel.

Absolutely. And there’s also, as you’re starting out, that specific story with the customer and a client of yours. I mean, I was thinking, and these thought processes came to my mind, right? 

So if you have a price point for your existing product and you want to launch a new product, typically they go by, okay, 2x that’s fine, and that’s because the sales guys are comfortable selling at a 2x value, and even for the maybe it’s a product, and even the marketing folks and the finance folks, but then imagine when you propose it’s not 2x but 4x. There is a reconditioning of the sales process and how you position that product, all of those things now will have to change, because, again, going back to the same cup of coffee and different price points, it boils down to how you’re positioning the environment and what you’re creating.

Well, we just went through this, so folks, give me a more concrete example of this, one of the big news stories in my pricing world, and I think for most of the people who are in technology, it was recently Open AI released their ChatGPT Pro tier. Yeah, so their plus tier was what they had before. It was $20 per user per month, and then all of a sudden, they launched this $200 per user per month, and it made headlines. Made headlines for a lot of different reasons. One is that Sam Altman said he just picked it out of a hat. This is also the man who is fired by his board for not being consistently candid with them. So I don’t know whether I completely trust that that was exactly how they got to that number. They have enough money to hire some consultants, so maybe they got some external advice, or he maybe just pulled it out of the hat. 

But okay, you have, this was the exact same situation you have as the situation I described, where you had a new tier with a new value proposition. And what did opening I do? It’s 10x it’s not 4x it’s not 2x it’s 10x what it is. And you know what? People are paying for it.

Yes, and they see a lot of value, yeah. 

And people are paying for it, right? And so it’s, it’s an interesting, you know, example, I think everyone can see where it’s like, okay, you know, because, again, right? There’s a lot of emotion. No matter how you grew up, rich or poor, everyone has interesting relationships with money. We as product leaders or product marketers. We’re immersed in our product every day. We know what the roadmap is. We know all the features it doesn’t have yet. We know all the bugs have been reported by customers. So we know all we know where all the bodies are buried in the architecture and how it won’t scale. And so we look at this thing and we’re like, I can’t charge customers for this, right, right? 

But that’s, that’s the wrong view. It’s not about you, it’s about your customer, your customers desperate for a solution, and whatever they’re they’re willing to take on, Oh, that. Oh my god, this solves this problem. Because my alternative, instead of paying, you know, open AI, whoever $200 per month is to go, you know, hire a consulting agency who’s going to charge me whatever, $500 an hour to write this research, run this research report. This is an incredible value. I’m excited to pay for this. I’m so excited. I’m going on Twitter telling all my friends how much I’m paying them because it’s such an amazing deal. So I think, you know, we need to understand that that, again, going back to this pricing, anchoring emotional bias is like we have this sense that, oh my god, people are just going to think our customers are going to get with the pitchforks. And look, that happens. We could talk about examples like, you know, Reddit with their API charging, or there was unity with their gaming platform provider, right? They do. 

And, some of these pricing changes end up on the front page. The New York Times, and there are lessons to be learned there, and they make very they made some very bad mistakes, but it is possible to create tiers that are significantly different than what you’re currently charging. 

Absolutely no.

Strategic partnerships can be the catalyst for business growth and long-term success. In this episode, Emir Elliott-Lindo highlights the significance of cultivating strong relationships with partners and how collaboration can lead to mutually beneficial outcomes. 

Emir delves into the essential steps for fostering these relationships, from identifying the right partners to establishing clear communication and shared goals. 

Learn how leveraging partnerships not only creates new business opportunities but also helps brands gain credibility, expand their reach, and innovate together. 

Connect with Emir Elliott-Lindo on LinkedIn

Connect with Vijay Damojipurapu on LinkedIn

Listen to the podcast here:

The Power of Strategic Partnerships in Go-To-Market: How to Foster Relationships and Drive Growth With Emir Elliott-Lindo

Signature question:

So yeah, as always, I always start the podcast with the signature question, which is, how do you view and define go to market?

Great question. And it’s possible to say it’s probably specifically pertinent from a partnership standpoint, you know, where, where I live, if you will. So for me to go to market, you know, it’s really kind of the full end in kind of a comprehensive strategy and approach to for an execution plan for a company, you know, it’s kind of how they use it to deliver their products or services to their customers and to drive business growth. It’s not only just about sales and marketing anymore. It’s really kind of cross-functional in approach that lines, product, marketing, sales, customer success. 

And, you know, an area that I’m particularly interested in is partnerships, because partnerships are very cross-functional, yeah, right. And so many organizations have struggled with, you know, with partnerships, a part of go to market or not. It’s actually core and integral to go to market, especially in this space, where, in the day and age, where, you know, B2B, selling is, customers is, you know, they have their stacks. They’ve invested in complex technology and things like that. It’s so important to have the appropriate to ingrain partners into the go-to market, whether that’s, you know, the selling motions, whether that’s working with marketing from a product or content or brand standpoint, finance, all sorts of areas. 

So ultimately, you know, at the end of the day, it’s about, you know, go to market. It’s about your company’s strategy and how you execute it.

Yeah, now I love the fact that you touched upon the important aspect which a lot of folks overlook, which is it’s cross-functional. It’s not just sales and marketing. It includes products. It includes customer support, customer success, and other functions as well. So that’s really, really key. Fantastic. Yeah, so curious. I mean, when is the right time to think about partnerships yeah, especially depending on the product phase and the product maturity. So when is the right time to bring in and look at partnerships?

I mean, I’m a, I’m a big proponent, and, you know, our company, we do this where I’m a big proponent of bringing in thinking about partners, you know, from day one, right? Because there are so many different types of partners, and whether that’s, hey, I’m a chief product officer, and I have to think about, am I building on top of Azure, AWS, Google, etc, right? Type of thing. That’s one aspect of, how am I going to build, and then can I take advantage of the engagement and marketing and alignment opportunities with those companies, right? So that’s one example, right? Another would be, how am I going to deploy, deploy my solution? Or do we build a service organization? Or do we actually work with, you know, some smaller boutique partners, or GSIs or things like that, depending right on the size of the company, et cetera, but to do our deployment, thereby reducing our cost of delivery, right? 

Thereby, you know, allowing us to have a higher valuation. So I think about it day one, whether you execute on it day one. Yeah, sometimes you might, you might say, hey, we know we’re not going to do this, but we’re not. We’ll but once we get to 10 million in ARR, here’s our plan, right? Just be cognizant of the when why and how you’re going to partner at that stage of the growth, of your company. So from day one,

A great point. I mean, I love the fact that, especially if you’re thinking about building it in the cloud, you need to first of all, think about which partner, and which cloud platform you want to go with. And then also, as you said, right, from a technology point of view, yeah. Why this specific cloud platform as an example, right? Google versus Azure versus AWS and so on. And as you’re thinking about that, also the distribution and being on their marketplace? 

Yeah, well, distribution is, you know, first, do I start off with a referral, right? Do I join their marketplace? Many times, companies will say, Hey, I’m going to start and I’m going to put a like, an agency, reseller package together. And you know, one of the things that we say is, that’s fine, that’s that’s fine. But once again, know why you’re doing that. And also it’s not always about you, meaning, you know, companies will say, hey, I want this. Retailers, because I want access to their client base. Yeah, a more, more powerful way, more impactful way would be, hey, how do I help you? Agencies build your business around our platform, thereby helping them drive their service revenue, right? And guess what? You’ll get access to their customers, clients, as they call it. And then the other thing that will end up happening is, as they’re pitching, whether they win or not, they will recommend you, right? Because, so yeah,

I know we got into a lot of details already, so let’s take a big picture. So talk to us. I mean, enlighten the listeners and myself about your career journey, like from day one of your career and what led you to what you’re doing today, around partnerships and doing it on agency.

Yeah, thank you. Thank you. Yeah. So it’s funny, I’ve, I’ve got, I’ve been doing partnerships since about 1999 so about 25 years. And, you know, kind of get into that in a little bit. But, you know, my journey started. I’ll go back to when I was, when I was a little kid, right? I was, I grew up in Oakland, and, you know, a single mom for part of my life before she married my stepdad, who’s my dad, in a predominantly black community. However, I went to school in an area called Danville, which, back in those days, was primarily not a black community. I think I was, you know, in my high school, at my high school, probably one of maybe 20 black kids you know, out of out of probably 15 1600 kids. 

I say that because it provided me with an interesting perspective of being able to quickly be able to communicate with different types of people to make sure that you had integrity, empathy, and things like that, and really just becoming a trusted person relatively quickly from there, kind of, you know, obviously, went to college, all that kind of stuff, and I started my official career at Xerox back In those days, back in, you know, the 80s and early 90s, early to mid-90s, some of the top sales programs were Xerox, IBM, and any of I would say that, companies, Lucent, you know, at the time, Pac Bell, things like that.

So why sales? Just curious. Why did you pick sales back then? 

Well, I thought it was back then. I thought it was going to go into, like, advertising or communications or something like that. But back in 94-95, the economy was horrible. And so, you know, not a lot of jobs out there. And so, you know, I stumbled upon this Xerox agency that was like, hey, we need some sales folks. And ended up, you know, taking the job. And what’s interesting there is, once again, it continued to reinforce, I’d say a couple of things. One kind of Hey, you have to have integrity. You have to, you know, treat people well. I can tell you many stories about how, you know, I was walking around, knocking on doors, trying to tell Xerox copiers, and I go to a business, and I’m going into an office, little old ladies kind of walking up to me. 

The elevators are about to close. I stop it. I hold it, yeah. It gets on my competitors in the elevator with me, with this person. We go up. Guess what? She’s the person that was either the office manager who I needed to meet with, yeah, or she was the gatekeeper to the President, to whomever, right? Guess who got the meeting. 

Of course!

I treat people well. I don’t care if you’re a janitor or CEO, you’re still a human being, right? Treat people well. And so I’ve always done that. In fact, with Buddy, my mark, a newcomer, who was at Accenture and WPP and other things, he becomes mayor, making everyone feel like the most important person in the room, even the janitor. And then he executes on our business. Initiative, and that’s one of the critical pieces too, which is when I was at Xerox, and when I was at Alcatel Lucent, things like that were really about also the delivery. Like, right? If you say something and you’re going to do it, do it and show that impact. And so I bring that in moving forward. I ended up, you know, working, working at Siebel, where I manage the Deloitte Alliance globally. Interesting enough. That was a kind of a, I would say, a languishing partnership at Siebel, and quickly, within about a year and a half, two years, with the likes of folks like nada and Paul Clemens and other folks who are Deloitte, we were able to make it the number one selling GSI the last year or two that Siebel was in existence, and that was, you know, yes, Accenture and IBM were doing more revenue, but Deloitte was the one that the sales teams wanted to engage with. 

I’ve been at Jive, where I’ve managed relationships with Accenture, I’ve managed regional relationships, and probably one that’s critical is I ran the alliances team at Marketo for about three and a half years. So that’s our strategy, Facebook, LinkedIn, saps, and the agencies. I personally signed WPP up with Mark Reed and other folks, Accenture, etc. And I guess that would, I would kind of boil it down. I’d say, in this age, where I’d say I came at the tail end of, kind of, I’d say alliances 1.0 which I would categorize as primarily channels, right? A lot of channels, it was just a different distribution model. Usually, it was a salesperson that you just said, Hey, own these five, five folks, you know, I’d say alliances was more of the kind of wine and cheese, that’s what they kind of used to call it, right? And then when I joined the Siebel, you know, and, you know, there was a, what’s it called, a Harvard Business Review written around, I would say that was the first real kind of alliances, 2.0 if you will, around, go to market plans actually being tied directly to revenue, when not and Driving sourced and, co sell revenue and creating solutions offerings. 

I’d say Siebel was probably the, you know, kind of the cutting edge, if you will, of there. Luckily enough, I was actually, I think whether it’s the end or beginning part of, I’d call it partnerships or ecosystem 3.0 which were kind of Marketo when you think about having our launch point ecosystems, having large ecosystems, and you know, early adoption of marketplaces around you, being able to have regional partners, channels and big Strategic Services, partners in big Strategic Tech with, once again, that larger ecosystem around you. 

And so I’d say that that’s kind of 3.0 and we’re entering this age, I would say, of kind of partnerships 4.0 or ecosystem, you know, 4.0 where, you know, lucky enough, we’re starting to, I would say, be invited to the boardroom, I think as part of go to market partnerships, is definitely more ingrained into what companies are doing. We can talk about that a little bit later. And the last piece, I would say is, if you think about HR, when did they get the seat at the table, when they had a system of record right marketing, when did they get a seat at the table? 

You know, back in the 2000s they had systems of record, marketing automation systems, and things like that, partnerships, I would say the time is ours right now. However, the question is, are we going to have our own system of record, or is it more of we have systems, but we need to make sure that our metrics and KPIs are pushed to the right places, whether that’s CRM whether that’s a dose of bow for you know, like a for LMS system, whether that’s pulling and pushing information from a gain site, as an example, like, how are those APIs being used for your technology partners and your ISDS, and where do you want to lean into those? So it’s, it’s an interesting time, and we’re collaborating more now than ever, which, once again, has led me to fractional and strategic partnerships the cool thing about having fractional is at the team, and I can bring all that goodness of you know, maybe my services, expertise, and strategy, or some of my team who has technology or partner program build or partner marketing, and we can bring that all to bear for many of our clients. So we’d love to actually hear your thoughts on fractional at some point in time, kind of the rise of fractional. Know right now in the market?

Yeah, no, definitely, I will definitely share my thoughts and views on that. But just going back to your career story, Emir, it’s very interesting, and I love the fact that you actually called out what sales is truly about. Two things, right? Sales are about making others feel good as a human, that’s super important, but at the same time, the second and more important is delivering on what needs to be delivered, or what you said you’ll deliver for the client. Yes, it’s those two things, 

But in order to do that, you have to use two of these, not one of them. 

Yeah, totally. But that’s the thing. I mean, I’ve seen really top-tier sellers. They excel at both talking, but more so at listening, yeah, for sure, right? And that’s key to really understanding the person, the human, not just a fire at a company, yes, yeah. And then eventually you transition into more alliances and partnerships. That’s a good transition. It’s kind of..

I kind of just fell into it. And all in all reality, I was a direct seller at Lucent, and I was working with the if you remember, the E-business innovators, the science and bias, and all those companies. And once again, like I was, I was selling to them, but I was also working with mentioning his name, again, Paul Clemens and Mark Whalen, who’s CRO box, all that kind of stuff. I was working with them, with Chris, Chris Lockhead, the CMO of science, who’s, you know, one of the, you know, one of the most amazing CMOS out there, and Lucent at the time, was like, Yeah, we need somebody to manage some of these partners, these companies. And they’re like, well, Emir’s been selling to him. Maybe he should be an alliance person. And I was like, What is this alliance stuff? Yeah, you know. And I was interested enough. I was actually told by my manager at the time that I shouldn’t do it and that I would fail. And the VP of the West region, James say, who he’s the one that brought me in was like, I got your back. Go, if that’s what you want to do, go, you’ll be successful. And have been doing it since 1999.

Very cool. It’s all the accidental path or accidental discovery of where you’ll truly shine. And you also called out something else, which is the backing of someone at the leadership level. Yeah, that’s important as well.

Yeah, that’s important, not in your career, but also as part of go to market and partnering and things like that, you know, support and sponsorship and all the rest of that. 

So, yeah, no, very cool. So on a lighter note, like, what is your family? I mean, you’re you even you mentioned you have two daughters, and you’re married, and so what do they think? And how would they describe what AMR does for a living? 

Yeah, thank you for that. Well, it’s funny. I think my wife, she’s a CRO and has worked with her teams implementing SAP and workday, and she’s worked with Deloitte and Accenture and PwCs and things like that of the world. And she gets it funny enough, so she probably gets it better than most people, which is great. My kids, however, it’s pretty funny. I would know they kind of get what I do. But when they were younger, they would say stuff like, you know, dad, dad gets a lot of people, lot of different people from different companies together, usually tied to those marketing companies that this is obviously, when I was at Marketo, those marketing companies that you know when like, you receive a note, or you look at something On the web, and then you go to Facebook, you go somewhere else, and all of a sudden, you know, you see that same ad. They go, he does. He basically works with companies that either built that or the technology for that, but not in a creepy way. So now they get what they are doing, and it kind of makes me laugh, because now, you know, I have both of them in college. One of them had a happy birthday. Chloe, she’s turning 20 today. 

She specifically, right now, is starting to apply for internships and summer internships, and she’s applying to BCG, KPMG, Deloitte, and some different management consulting firms and things like that. And she’s saying, Ah, I’m now getting what you do. So it’s pretty cute. 

So yeah, and looks like your daughter is going. Based sounds like that. I mean, especially, essentially it’s she wants to get into, like the consulting world, at least, to try it out, and coming back to partnerships, working with GSIs, especially these global system integrators like Accenture Deloitte of the world, they’re super critical, yes,

yeah, 

yeah. So, it will be exciting to see kind of where they land, and yeah. And so, you know, as parents, you support them, so

Yeah. So coming back to your question, I didn’t, I was not ignoring your question. So coming back to your question about fractionals, and my thoughts on fractionals, I mean, honestly, my personal take, I’m not a big fan of fractionals for myself. But having said that, I’m working with a good friend of mine who was a CMO at real and scale-up companies, and now he’s exporting the fractional route. So just seeing the value that fractional leaders can bring to especially the early stage companies and startups where they’re at a point where the leadership, or even the board, thinks it’s not the right time to invest fully, for example, into like a marketing leader or a partner leader, but they want to test the waters right? 

Funnily enough, incident, I did have a fractional engagement for myself for a major part of last year, where the Chief Product Officer at a company that’s based in Detroit, and as you can imagine, is based in Detroit, which means they are serving the automotive industry. Wonder, yeah, and she wanted to test the waters with a product marketing leader, I mean, wanted to test the waters whether the organization is ready for a product marketing function. And obviously she’d want to invest in a full-time employee, right? And so, going back to the question, I think there’s definitely value, for fractional uh services and and, but personally, where I am for myself, I want to start building productized services. Oh, I’m making that transition this year in 20.

We’re going to dive into that. We’re going to dive into that. Yeah, but it’s interesting, because with the rise of the rise of fraction. I think that they’re probably one early stage to your point. You know, whether it’s HR, finance, partnerships, staff, product marketing, etc, definitely a value in the earlier seed series, interesting enough, I would say there’s also, having been inside 100, $200 million companies. There are also opportunities because I can tell you, there’ve been times when I’ve said, Hey, here’s what our strategy should be. And then our company brought in an external strategy consultant or consulting firm. And guess what? They gave him the same plan that we did, just probably, you know, some other details, but underneath. But it’s interesting because I think that you know, the Rise of fractions, whether fractional, whether it’s any, any specific area, is critical, because it helps you get up and running. And many of the folks have expertise in this space or can help you, even if you’re a 45-50000  million dollar company, can help you, kind of look at efficiencies, look at other opportunities and things like that. 

So, yeah, totally right. When I was an employee, I used to wonder why the C-level staff, where the executives spend, like, hundreds of 1000s or even millions of dollars on bringing in consulting companies like the Mckinseys, the BCGs, and Bains ,and so on. And then now I’m on the other side, and I see the value, and there’s a reason why, right, yeah. Anyway, that’s a whole different topic 

That is, that is session number two, yes, 

Exactly. All right. So coming back to your company, I’m looking at the name. So it says big friends, company partners, and you specialize in alliances and partnerships. Is that right? Correct?

Correct. Okay, we, yeah, yeah. 

Who do you serve like, and why are ICPs? 

Yeah, yeah. So I would say our ICP would be, it’s probably a couple, a few lenses you can look at first is size and company, right? So typically, we work with those companies that are, you know, doing, you know, two, three to 10 million in revenue, and that’s 10, 15 million, and that’s kind of one stage, right? That’s typically kind of your look, looking to make your first bite at the partnership Apple hires, kind of higher. Moda, your top sales rep, or something like that, to be, your head of alliances or something. And then, you know, they go out and kind of try to learn it, if you will. And so we come in as kind of that first alliance, quote, unquote higher, because we can bring in different, you know, the team. So you’re getting kind of a team. And so we can think about like I might have my point of view, right, my major and minor, Andy might have his. And so we can come up with the right solution for our clients. The other piece, so the next one would be those companies kind of in that 20 to 50 million that are looking they’re starting to scale, if you will. And you know, how do you, how do you engage with a sales force, if you if you’re working within their app exchange, how do you get engaged with AWS?

How have you had a couple of service companies now? How do you start to create proper enablement and and go after larger services companies, or look at global deployments, and then the last would be those companies, probably 100 to 500 million, that are looking at kind of a full refresh of their of their partner ecosystem, kind of strategy and plan and things like that. So that’s the company. Then there’s a lens on the actual roles within who we engage. Typically, we’ll engage with the CEO. Most of the time our sponsor is the CRO once again because they’re looking at, you know, how do you create pipeline generation, acceleration of revenue growth, and things like that. But once again, we always want to have access to the full executive team. 

So CEO, CFO, CMO, Chief Product Officer, and services, we think of ourselves a little bit differently than kind of your traditional consulting firms, because many will kind of say, Hey, here’s our framework, here’s our PowerPoint. Thank you. Right? We think of ourselves more inside out, and so when we work with our clients, we have their email, right? So I would have an email as part of that company or access to Salesforce, so then we can actually be ingrained in that company to help them drive, once again, the outcomes that we all agreed to. So the other piece is, so when you think about, kind of the, I’d say the four stages, we kind of will do we’ll do, like a maturity or growth assessment, we’ll build their strategy. You know, if you’re looking at, like tech partners, what’s your stack, and what are the categories, and who are those companies within the category that you should be leaning into, and then prioritize which ones might be more of the Hey, you’re going to go to market with these, but these other ones, they should build integrations. They should still be part of your ecosystem. And maybe it’s a little bit of one of those kinds of tactical things we will do the execution, the management, and execution. So we’ll build partner programs, things like that. We’ll manage their service partners, and at the end of the day, what we do is we’ll help hire or train our replacement at any of these companies. So, but at the end of the day, it’s about, you know, aligning go-to-market strategy and driving that impact. 

Very cool, yeah, looking back at your extensive career, both running your own company, as well as the different executive leadership roles that you have taken on or took on earlier, and if you go back and look at all those like, clearly, there were going to market success stories and go to market failure stories. So if you can share with our listeners both, like a success story and a failure story, I’ll let you choose which one you want to start with, but yeah, it’ll be good if you can cover both.

I guess I would look at everything as being every, opera, every success, there are things that you could fix. And every failure, you know, there’s things that you can learn from, if you will. So sure, I would say, you know, it’s, you know, from a go-to market success standpoint, one of the ones I’ll talk about is when we were at and actually there was a little bit of a failure in there for us, a tweak, and then we brought it back. But when I was at when I was running partnerships at Marketo, one of the ones that Phil was like, you gotta go. We need a big GSI. I want Accenture Deloitte, and I want a big, big agency or two such as WPP or Publicist, something like that. 

And, you know, had a deep relationship with the sixth century and Deloitte and things like that. Unfortunately, we couldn’t partner with Deloitte due to some audit items, you know, with our VCs, which is standard with some of those companies where they when they audit, you can’t partner with. They officially, but Accenture. We were working up to sign the we were we were developing our partner Alliance agreement. We had enabled resources. We had opportunities and deals in the hopper and it and, you know, we had Rob Davies, Ryan Dubey, Ryan Walzer, a whole bunch of folks with this within Accenture and Accenture Interactive. And the fantastic thing is, mean we were, we were doing, we were building, doing, account mapping, account planning. In our early days, we had built a go-to-market where we were one of the areas that we wanted to lean into from a marketing automation standpoint, that is the alignment between marketing automation and E-commerce. 

So we were looking at Hybris, and we were developing an offering around that. This is where the quote, unquote might be small, a little potential failure that we were able to pull up the game. So we had been selling with Accenture, on a client, on a potential prospect, with our services team, and there was literally we had everything agreed. We were having joint meetings and things like that. It was Friday when we found out that the prospect had decided to go directly to Marketo, PS. PS was high five in like, Hey, we got this. We got this. That following Monday, Accenture was flying out to sign our agreement. They heard about that. I got a call, and they were like, till you guys figure this out, we’re not signing any agreement with you guys. And so I had to get Phil and Jason Holmes and a bunch of other folks together. Interestingly enough, this is where I’d like to think of things as more positive. We were able to kind of come back and say, hey, you know, mea culpa. We put some guardrails and some guide guard rails and guidelines in place, and we were able to sign the agreement. A few months later, they ended up sponsoring the Marketo summit in a pretty big way as a platinum sponsor, yeah. And you know, we went out and you know, we’re closing deals across multiple regions, not only just North America, but we were closing some deals in the UK, Germany, and other places. So great ended up being a great partnership. And still, you know, work and talk to many of those folks to this day, when I think about failures.

I actually had a question on the market and Accenture story that you shared, and great story, by the way, for me, I was aware of those when I said those like, like alliances and partnerships. Especially it takes me back to my days at SugarCRM, where we had our head of partnership our CMO and CRO Clint Oram and Juan, and whenever we were in discussions about launching a new product or planning for our next annual conference, it was all about partnerships, right, and ensuring that the partners get their deal, both in terms of pipeline revenue as well as spotlight. And you mentioned the market and this client trying and having a professional services agreement directly with the market or bypassing the future prospect of GSI so curious like, How can I mean, obviously, you had to play the bring us all in together and mend the relationships, if you will. But, what advice would you give, especially for those who are I mean, it’s obviously because there are people within the company who want to get the deal for themselves right, versus going through a partner because it’s a miss on their side. 

Yeah, yeah. I mean, yeah, it’s, that’s as it’s, it’s the constant struggle of awareness and all that kind of stuff. Because, as we know, compensation and metrics drive behavior, right? And so I would say the first piece is you have to make sure that your executive staff, starting with the CEO, is aligned with, here’s how we’re going to engage with our partners, right? Because the reality is, they have a choice, right? Yeah, there were multiple marketing automation systems that they could have used, right, to pick their clients. Um. Um, they picked us because of the not only solution, very robust solution, but also the strong relationships and things that we had with them and we, and we mutually delivered together, which is, you know, which you know, many times the partners, they have a long history with their clients, right? And so I would say it starts at E staff, right? Have to be, make sure that they’re aligned. Have to make sure that, this is why we do a lot of steering committees or governance committees with your executive staff. Whether that’s, you know, monthly, quarterly, it can’t just be, you know, set it and forget it, right? 

You do your readout at the end of the year, or beginning of the year, and then you don’t come back to the east staff until the same time the next year. And so being able to come in and say, Hey, here’s where we’re leaning into here’s our strategy, here’s what we’re going to do from a services standpoint, and the CEO and CRO, head of services, saying, Yep, this is what we’re going to do, and here’s how we potentially will compensate our account managers or AES or our professional services team if they bring in a partner, so it’s not going to impact their compensation. 

That’s always a great thing. But also, there’s a little bit of enablement in education within companies that say you can do this, right? You can go sell and you, if you take it on yourself, guess what? That services partner, typically, as an example, is sitting with the CMO or the CRO or the CEO, building their strategy, and their digital transformation. Yes, you might get your small deal, but that could be taken out in a year or two, and they could replace it with something else. And so that’s why it’s imperative for the awareness internally, for folks to say, hey, here’s why you’re going to partner, and here’s the value to you. It’s going to help you uncover opportunities. It’s going to help cross-sell and upsell. It can help you get into deeper relationships. These partners can be friendly. They’re not here to take deals away from you, 

Right.

In fact, if they are enabled, they’re incentivized, because they want to get their people working on those opportunities, so then they can go find more. 

Yeah, yeah, cool. 

And that’s why they want to create solution offerings and things like that. Because of that, because then they can rinse, repeat, 

Yeah, not totally. And are these typically caught at, like, a deal desk review situation or, like, when are these really flagged directly versus partner?

Yeah, so as early as possible, right? If we work with marketing as an example to start the process of, hey, if we did an event, or whether that’s a webinar, whether that’s sponsoring something, can we capture that as a partner opportunity, not necessarily led yet? Yep, right. So partner opportunities, so then we can keep an eye on it. Then it goes down to once it becomes a lead and we’re working with sales, you know, this is where it comes in. We want sales to reach out to us and say, Hey, we understand that. You know, this services company or this technology company is potentially at this client. Can you get me and get me introduced to them, right? That’s why things like cross beams are great, you know because that helps to start to identify, you know, where other partners are in your accounts, even before you’re even marketing. But you gotta create that awareness. 

You have to teach, talk to, and enable them how to have those conversations with their clients, right, or their prospects. Who are you, who are yours, who are your services companies, who are doing your implementations, who’s building your strategy, and what other technology to use? That’s all information that the salespeople should be putting into their CRM system, Salesforce dynamics, whatever, and that should be that should flow to your partner team. So then we can start to go, Oh, hey, I know that slalom, or whoever is there, let me connect our AE, put together an account plan, execute on that account plan, and the services partner might get the services or the services we get the SaaS revenue, 

Right!

And we’re all happy. And then we go, now, how do we do this again? 

Yeah, yeah, cool. All right, let’s go back to our earlier go-to-market failure story. You are just about getting started on that. 

Yeah, I would say it’s learning right? So we had a client that was built on Salesforce, and interesting enough, and this is where I talk about, you know, challenges. But how do you, how do you, you could turn those into successes too, but, and they were interesting. Enough about that, they were like, Hey, we’re going to lean into Salesforce, but we’re probably going to switch to AWS at some point in time because we think we’ll get more out of it. And they brought, you know, brought big friends in, and we went, Whoa, hold on you. You have a gold mine, not that, you know, get your AWS chief product officer. 

You gotta do what you got to do. But we’re like, you have all these customers that have implemented or engaged with you from a Salesforce perspective, and the previous year, I think they’d had only about maybe 10 conversations with Salesforce. We came in and went, hold on. Let us pull together a plan. Let us engage with our partner, the account manager. We’re able to keep them at the summit level or get them to the summit level. That year, we ended up having over 75 conversations with their field, with our field, to go out and drive the pipeline together. And once again, many times it’s, it’s its pipeline. Sometimes it’s just, it’s the sharing of information, right? 

We had one Salesforce AE who said, Listen, I’ve sold everything I can at my customer, I will get paid because you’re built on Salesforce. I’ll get paid a little bit for what you do, but it’s, it’s not, it’s not, it’s minimal, right? I can, I can go out and buy, you know, some iPods or something like that, but, but what she said is, she goes. Part of the reason I’m doing this is I need to keep service her competitors, service now, Microsoft at the time, right? I need to keep those out of my clients. So she shared a boatload of information on the customer’s strategy, procurement process, how much budget, and things like that. Our AE was over the moon going, yes, they can’t get me in there. They can’t introduce me. But this is all the information that I needed to go sell my deal. And guess what, six months later, sold an enterprise-wide deal to, this client. 

Very cool. Yeah, yeah. Good stuff. 

So I know we are, so that’s a failure to success, right?

Good stuff. So I know we are coming to the end of our conversations. So going back again, going back to your career and all the different stages and all that. I mean, what resources or people or mentors really shaped and played a big role in your career transitions? 

That’s a big one. So let’s see people that are shaped. I’ll start that. There are a few there. So you know, starting with my pops, Donald Lindo, you know, the hardest working man in the business. But you know, he taught me from, from, from day one, right? Shoot for the stars. You’ll read, at the minimum, you’ll reach the moon, right? And so, you know, it’s kind of one of those like, push yourself every day. Believe in yourself. And yeah, some days do we have? Do we question? Yeah, but it’s always, he’s like, just keep on pushing. Does not matter. And so I’ve always kept that in my mindset and the funny thing is, at the end of the day, he’d always say, you know, I love what I do. He goes, don’t get me wrong, and he goes, make sure you love what you do. He goes, but I do this. 

And you know, one his one point, he was doing what he did for two he was in the Navy. He was working a weekend job, and he was doing it for his family because I got to do this for my family. And he goes, when we want to do that San Diego trip, because we, I was in the Bay Area, he’s like, this is why I do this, right? So I can enjoy it with you guys, and we can do what we want to do. And so I always take that to heart, just family, work hard and, once again, and he’s a big integrity person as well. Second person, there are actually three. Paul Clemens mentioned him a couple of times. He’s been integral to my career. He was the first person when I was at Lucent, working with him when he was at Scientist kind of almost, you know, whether he knew it or not. Kind of teach me or enable me on how to do this partner job, the right type of thing, pulling together joint proposals, putting together value props of their services with our technology tied to call centers and things like that. 

And you know, he’s been a proponent of mine for years. And back when I was at Siebel, he and a guy named were my two sponsors, and we were able to grow that. And you know, he’s at Deloitte. He’s been there for years, ran the Salesforce practice, ran the line. Is, and I think probably the biggest thing is his belief in me kind of gave me the confidence to go, you know, along with James say, Dad, to go, you know, what? I can do this. 

And that was kind of the foundation of my partnership career, to bookend it on the people. One of the other kind of integral folks is a guy named Tony, namelka. He was SVP of strategy BD at Marketo. He’s been at Adobe PeopleSoft Oracle, running kind of their eight APAC regions in Japan, master strategist. I’d heard about him for years and ended up going to work for him at a company called Badgeville. He pulled me over to Marketo to kind of be a player-coach and build up the alliances team. And so they really emphasized the importance of aligning partner strategies and metrics with the broader that’s what we talked about at the very beginning, broader go-to-market goals, understanding those key metrics and how it relates to CAC, LTV, all that kind of stuff. And, you know, his mentorship really kind of helped me develop. 

And to go, you know what? I can talk to all these other executives. I don’t have to be afraid to go in and talk to our CFO as a partner manager or partner director. And I tell partner leads, to this day I go, they’ll talk to finance, they can be your friend, right? So…

Yeah. 

And in terms of your other question, or the other one is, you know, how do I stay up to date? I will say I need to read more, and that’s something that’s on my New Year’s resolution. For example, the in-revenue capital folks have their cheat code book coming out. Definitely going to be checking that out, reading that when, when I get it from Amazon, when it hits my doorstep, type of thing. But in general, the way I stay on top is one having conversations, whether it’s like this, I had one earlier with guy Lou Taylor. We were talking specifically about partner metrics and how they relate to E staff if you will. And we were talking about our perspectives, and given my point of view, he gave me his point of view, and started to align on things. And so love learning from other people, especially when you can go to things like a pavilion, or you can engage with folks like winning by design or Arcadia leadership experience, partnership leaders, all organizations that have a ton of good information, a lot of great collaboration. People want to talk. They want to learn new things. 

So, you know, those are some of the podcasts I talked about, you know, some of the podcasts I listened to. What is it? Follow your differences with Chris Lockheed, with Jason Yerba and his wife, Sam, friends with benefits and, you know, all sorts of other things. I, as I said, the one place I gotta do is, you know, I gotta, I gotta pick up one of these. And more than I, than I have. There’s a ton of great content out there. 

Yeah, no, I, I mean, you, you emphasize something which I want the listeners to take away from this podcast, which is, there’s never a point in time, or there should never be a point in time where you stop learning. The moment you stop learning, your career stalls or goes down, right, and the ways you can learn is through people like the mentors that you mentioned, Elliot, There are even books that you are looking to pick up and increase throughout this year, and podcasts, right? And podcasts, plus even communities like the pavilion that you mentioned, great community, or go to market, for sure, exactly. And there’s, and there was, I will say, you know, there are some great 

There’s a lot of great LinkedIn on LinkedIn and other places. A lot of great content that I do read, you know, type of things and weather and you know, Forster and Gartner and other places have some good stuff. So just, you know, try to try to be aware and stay ahead of the game so that my gray matter doesn’t, you know, atrophy.

All right, so the final question to you is, if you were to turn back the clock, what advice would you give to your younger self? And I mentioned I’m thinking about and what I want to think about is like day one of your go-to-market journey. What advice would you give to yourself, the younger Emir?

Well, first, and I’m just going to give a shout-out because this was a question, I know we talked about, but you know, I’d say, make sure you’re working with your product marketing team. Shout outside, but I truly do believe that they’re the keepers of the positioning, the messaging to go to market for a company, and that’s integral for partner teams to go. How do I make sure my partner segments are aligned with those and when, when I have a message out to those partners of, why partner with Dot? Dot, dot company? Right? I can say, you know, hey, here’s why, you know, name one ship paradigm, here’s why you should be partnering with us, and here’s the value, and here’s the positioning messaging of our company, and why it relates to you, right, typically. 

So I just know that. But you know what I mean, like, it’s like, PMM is definitely something integral, and I also bring them into my meetings as an example, many times when we’re developing solutions with, you know, in the example, when I was given about Accenture earlier, actually when I was doing some stuff with Deloitte when I was at Siebel always had my PMM there when we were going, Oh, hey, we have Siebel component assembly. We have this new solution. What? What is the solution? We ran a workshop with Deloitte right then built our PMM team, the offering, and we went out to market together, and that was with my product marketer sitting, you know, sitting right by me, co-piloting with me. 

So fantastic. So I appreciate the shout-out.

So but, but, so that’s, that’s number one. But from, from, from day one, I would say there’s, there’s probably a couple of things. One is, especially younger in your career, you try to do too much. And I would just say, focus and do fewer things. Well, instead of trying to do a lot of things, especially when in a place where you’re in an area where I was completely new right to partnerships, and I’m like, Yeah, I can do all this, yeah, really just focus, because then you’re able to drive kind of that measurable impact, and then, and then you move to the next metric, or KPI, and deliver there. 

Second, I would say, is, you know, second confidence, don’t I would say, maybe earlier in my career, I might have been a little bit cocky, is what it is. Sometimes at an early age, age you are confident, not only in the kind of yourself and everything that you do, but also many times when, especially when you’re younger in your career, you have some you have great ideas, especially when I came out, like, we have great ideas, but it was always like, the E staff and leaders that that, you know, kind of, yeah, executed on those or kind of said, Hey, here’s what we should do. And you just kind of went, Okay, the amount of times that I had an idea in my head, and then my VP or somebody above went, Oh, hey, here’s what I think we should do. And I’m like, I’ve been thinking about that for months, right? So, you know, just, you know, don’t be afraid. You know, everybody, we’re all human beings. Open your mouth. Don’t get fed, type of thing. 

So, yeah, yes, able to see now get put your ideas out there and the end with this one, which ties back to fractional, which is in this kind of ties to that, which is the amount of times I kid you not, I remember driving on 280 in the Bay Area having a conversation with Christine Myers and Adam Marlin when I worked with him at Lucent, and literally that we were going, know what? 

Maybe we should jokingly, we’re like, maybe we should form alliances, R Us, right? A fractional life. This is back in Yeah, 2000, 2002 right? Maybe I had another conversation with my buddy, my James. We talked about BD and partnerships and building and, you know what? 20, 2019 when I found big friends, you know, it’s like, Should I’ve done it sooner? Yeah, type of thing. But you live and learn from the experiences that you have out there. But I wouldn’t give up my experiences of that habit, Siebel, Marketo jive, etc, for anything so

sure. 

Great, great piece of advice there.

Dive into the latest episode of the B2B Go to Market Leaders podcast, where Gururaj Pandurangi shares groundbreaking insights on evolving GTM strategies, focusing on problem-centric selling, scalable outreach, and building trust to drive business growth.

They explore how trust-building conversations and validating problem statements with potential buyers can lead to co-creating impactful solutions.

Listeners will gain practical knowledge on building trust by addressing key problems, validating challenges with ideal customer profiles, leveraging automation to overcome cold outreach limitations, and adapting to modern sales and marketing dynamics.

Listen to the podcast here:

Bootstrapping to Scaling Revenue to Exit:  GTM Conversation with Gururaj Pandurangi, 3x Founder

Signature question: Which do the listeners love, which is how do you view and define go-to-market? 

That’s an interesting question. So typically if you had asked me this question about three, or four years back, I would have had a very different answer. 

And my answer has been evolving pretty much on a year-on-a-year basis. This is my current answer. And maybe we can look at how I thought earlier as well. 

My current answer is that GTM is necessarily a set of practices that brings your product or service to the market, engages with the customers, and when pretty much your customer’s trust. I’m not talking about practices like, hey, this needs to be done by either the sales or the marketing teams, or it’s done by the product management team, or you need to have a separate org for sales and marketing. 

I’m talking about a set of practices that a company will employ to get its products distributed across the market. 

I love the way you phrased it and how you started, which is evolving.

I think that that’s the key. And I wish a lot more people realize that go-to-market is never ever stationary. It’s always evolving. 

I mean, the first thing is our own understanding as a leader or as a practitioner, the go-to-market thought process will evolve, which you alluded to. And second is go-to-market, the motion itself will evolve for every company, every stage, every year. 

Yeah. 

And I think, you know, maybe to not so much harp on that, a couple of years back, I should think, and I came from an engineering product management kind of a background. And I should think that, hey, we build a product, we hire, you know, some sales guys, some marketing guys, you know, they’ll talk about it, they’ll go to roadshows, and it’s their problem. They’ll do the selling, they’ll do the positioning, they’ll do the marketing. Essentially, there’s a separate team, a separate practice, and a separate set of incentives for them—let them deal with that.

My evolution has been that, hey, that doesn’t work, at least in the last maybe three, four, or five years. The entire company has to figure out how to make this happen with product-led motions coming into play over the last four to five years, which has evolved significantly.

Product has become more and more central, rather than something you build and then throw over the fence to the sales and marketing team to sell. My evolution has been that, hey, this is a company strategy, not necessarily an org within the company. 

Correct. That’s super important, right? It’s not a marketing or sales version of go-to-market; it’s a company product or service go-to-market. It’s about how each of these functions works hand-in-hand across the board—from product conception or product team to marketing, to sales, and if it’s SaaS-oriented or even service-oriented, like post-sales and support, and so on.

Very cool. I’m sure we’ll dive into a lot more detail about all these nuances. So let’s take a step back. Big picture, why don’t you walk us through your career trajectory, history, how you started your professional career, and what led you to what you’re doing today?

Yeah, that’s a great question.

I don’t have a simple answer to this, but let me walk you through my career journey. Half of my professional life after graduating in engineering and completing my master’s, I spent working as an employee, either in engineering or product management roles at larger companies, building large-scale SaaS services—either building version-one products for Microsoft or Oracle or various other version-one products. For the second half of my career, I’ve been building startups.

I’ve founded or co-founded two companies, built and scaled them, they got acquired, and now I’m building a third startup called ThriveStack. That’s why my answer to your previous question has evolved. Having been an employee for half my career and a founder and GTM leader in the second half, I had to relearn many things. At Microsoft, for example, you’re building a product, and when you talk to customers, they already know about some of the things you’re building because of the toolchain and marketing chain that’s been established. It’s very receptive. In contrast, at a startup, you have to build everything from the ground up.

So that’s my career in, you know, less than a minute. 

Yeah, I love the way you split it up—first, you were an employee in different functions, and then you became a founder, starting companies and having successful exits.

Let’s double-click on a few of those. Interesting, you say that, Gururaj Pandurangi. Similar to your experience and thought process, even when I was at Microsoft a decade or so ago, and I was a product marketing lead for one of the products there, I recall a conversation where my manager said to me, “Hey, Vijay, you know what, you should go and launch, and you’re responsible for the go-to-market for this product.”

I was super excited. I mean, back then, 10 to 12 years ago, being responsible for go-to-market was super exciting, and I thought, okay, this is great.

But lo and behold, during the process and project initiative, I realized that it was more about ensuring the checklist was maintained. It’s a bill of materials with all these terms, right? 

That’s true. 

I think you probably realized this as well.

You know, now when you look back at it, the word “launch” itself is a very loaded term. If you’re in the product marketing world, it might be a checklist of marketing things that you have to do. If you’re in engineering, launch essentially means a set of release activities you do.

If you’re in sales, you have a set of automations or bring in your Rolodex of customers and talk to them. The word “launch” has bearings in different ways; it means different things to different people.

Yeah. And which is why I think, you know, product marketing manager (PMM) roles have become kind of a glue across these organizations.

Yeah, so rightly put.

Yeah, yeah. So I’d like to double-click on your transition.

You were at Microsoft and large companies, and then you grew up the ladder in engineering and product management roles. At what point in time, or what was the inflection or motivation for you to go down the whole founder and startup world? What led you down that path?

There were many different reasons. First of all, I’ll give you maybe a snippet of time.

I was working on Bing, and Bing had just launched, and we were integrating an ads platform. I was growing the API and the index layer underneath. So I was building essentially the platform strategy towards it.

Yeah. We were getting attacked by various bots. We also took over Yahoo search and Facebook search.

Right.

So we were essentially becoming a syndication partner to all of these search engines that were out there. I was spending about 70–75 hours a week on it. My wife and I had just had a baby.

I talked to my managers and my wife, and I decided, hey, you know what, instead of me spending about 70–75 hours a week working for somebody else, why don’t I try my hand at building something of my own? I had no clue how to build my own thing. So a buddy of mine at AWS and another at Hortonworks sat down, and we started brainstorming.

He said, you know what, all of us have a cloud background—why don’t we build something in the cloud? We spent about a month and a half looking into it.

As we talked to more people, we realized they wanted backup solutions. They had some things in the data center and wanted to use the cloud as a backup. We pretty much bootstrapped a backup and recovery product.

If you had a data center, you’d back it up into AWS or Azure and take it from there. Three or four months later, we started doing meetups here in Seattle. The cloud was being built here in Seattle.

So many people from around the world came to Seattle to meet and have conversations. At one of these large meetups, we presented the idea of a backup—we didn’t even have a product. We said, hey, wouldn’t it be nice if we could click a button, get the backup here, and route the traffic over to the cloud at the fastest pace?

We showed them some mocks at our meetup, where about 150 folks were there. After the 45-minute conversation, we were stormed with questions.

We had so many conversations that same day, we decided to build a company around it. We didn’t have a product—we had mocks. We weren’t even thinking of building that mock; it was just more of a “what if this was there?”

Yeah, that’s an amazing story.

The reason is that a lot of founders have passion and go down the path of starting a company, but more often than not, they end up building a product and then figuring out ways to sell it.

Yeah. 

Since you flipped it and started with, hey, this is the concept—what if you were to build a product? Is there a demand for this?

Right. So what led your team of three co-founders to go down that path? It’s not natural.

To go build a product?

No, to go down the path of finding and validating the demand for an idea.

Well, it was incidental. Two of us were engineers, and one of us was a product manager.

We were just thinking out loud. We wrote some things on a whiteboard, called up a few other folks in our co-working space, and asked, “Hey, what do you think of something like this?”

Every single time we had a conversation like this, a bunch of folks would gather around and ask, “Can you do this? Can you do that?” If we had done this in isolation—sitting in an office and racking our heads—we would have gone nowhere.

The impetus was being in a crowd of people who wanted something like this, and we were there incidentally. I would have done it completely differently if I had money.

I would have actually rented an office and then brainstormed there. But I think it was actually a good practice to be in a group of people, potential prospects, and potential customers and brainstorm with them. 

Yeah, yeah.

And it sounds like you did the initial fundraising after I mean, you guys were bootstrapping until then. For the first startup, we did not raise funds. Actually, we had no idea how to raise capital.

We had no idea how to sell. So all of us were engineers or product managers, we essentially were builders. 

Avian Corporation.

No, it was called Avid. And a bunch of MSPs, including Accenture, Avanade, and all of those guys were also participating with us. And they essentially said that, hey, we have a customer who has a massive data center, could we use your product, you know, and, you know, paint it up with our service.

So Accenture actually made a proposal, they actually sent us a written proposal on that. And they said, if we can do that, you know, we can try about 600-700 virtual machines that exist in our data center. Push up, you know, right now, we’re doing this manually.

And if we can use your product to do this in like two days’ time, that will be a significant savings for us. And we could use that savings to fund some of your products. So that was their proposal coming in from their side.

We actually did not prospect it from them. And we found it very interesting. You know, it’s like, hey, I had never worked with partners.

You know, I was thinking that if, you know, is partner-led strategy, even, you know, even existing, I had no idea. 

Yeah. 

But then I realized that this is possible.

So and we said, yes, we negotiated on, you know, who’s going to own it, who’s going to take the money, you know, essentially, all the people who are associated with that. We won that. And we got Infosys, you know, coming and knocking on our door.

We had Avanade coming and knocking on our door. And we didn’t have a product. We had, you know, we had bits and pieces of it.

And we started getting all these requests. So what we did at that time is, you know, taking a bunch of interns from, from UW, from Berkeley, from Stanford, we’re all here in Seattle. We just grabbed them and said, hey, you know what, let’s put a seven to eight-member team of interns who were very hungry, very, you know, raring to go.

We put them into a room, we start calling the shots. And I was still employed. And I decided that, hey, now’s the time for me to quit.

Nice. Yeah. 

Yeah.

So of the three people, who are founders, two of us quit, and one did not. And one was, you know, moon, you know, doing moonshots with us with, you know, doing this moonlighting actually helped us quite a bit, you know, Amazon or AWS became one of our partners as well. He was working at AWS, and he got connections into AWS S3 and the virtual machine team.

So, you know, nothing wrong in, you know, having moonlighting and people, people say, I think all the Y Combinator folks and accelerators folks and say, hey, go 100% full time is not necessarily needed. If you can leverage the position that people are in, you know, there’s nothing like it. 

Yeah, there are always two lines of thought, right? Maybe even more, but definitely do one thing.

And then you’ll figure out a way it’s almost a parallel or a story where I believe the captain burns down the ship and puts all the sailors on the boat or something, and they need to figure out a way to just figure it out, I mean, go out and explore. There’s no turning back. The other is you’re still in your full-time role, but then you’re vetting out the demand, validating the idea, and then seeing that there are people willing to buy.

And once you see solid traction, then you move. Yeah, yeah. I would rather put this into a slightly principled framework.

I would say that if you’re going to say, I want to build a company, you have no idea, no demand, and saying, hey, I have a bunch of money, I can raise capital, you know, let me go ahead and start building a company. And then I’ll figure out what the problem is. Then I’ll figure out what the solution is.

You know, that’s not the right motivation to start a company. You know, your motivation should be that there is a need in the market. Nobody else is building it.

Why don’t I go build a company? I’ve seen more and more companies who have been successful with the thought that nobody else is doing it, right? Or somebody else is doing it, but not doing it the right way. Let me actually set the right path. I think that’s probably the founder-led mode, you know, mostly that I’ll see.

But if the motivations are, I want to go on a lot of money, I can go build a startup, sell it, you know, not the right way to go at it. For sure. And you did mention about Accenture helping you guys bootstrap.

So did Accenture and other partners come out of the meetup that you mentioned? Or how did they find you guys? Yeah. So we had one of the Accenture solution architects in the meetup. These were some nerdy guys, you know, saying, hey, I’m doing this.

I’m running some commands like this and taking this, you know, and we went on a discovery mode with them, you know, even at that time, like, could you tell us how do you currently do it? Right. What is it that you can improve from your side? We just had a thought that, hey, it should be like a click of a button and you should, you know, that’s like a high-level vision, but we had no idea on how people were actually doing it. There were quite a few folks in the industry who were doing it.

And once we put it out there, you know, we got lots and lots of requests from Europe, from Australia, from places where, you know, we had not even thought about. And we wrote the GitHub blog, you know, GitHub wasn’t existing as such at that time, but we started putting it out there on Reddit on, you know, on various places. And then we started receiving, you know, that, hey, this is how we do it.

Can you show us how you do it? So it was not necessarily a sale. It was more of, I wanted to learn. Can you help me learn? 

Yeah. Yeah. Beautiful. Love that mindset. And then what is the transition like to Avian? 

Like, oh, yeah. So we built this, we built this and it got acquired by a group of investors, mostly because we were earning a lot of money. And, you know, every single deal that we used to get was a one-off deal, right? Accenture would say, hey, there are 700 things that we want to run, you know, in two days’ time, if your product can do this, we’ll pay you so much.

And we would happily take it. But the next month, you know, it would not be a recurring revenue. So we’re building the product and we’re burning, you know, quite a bit of our own internal cash.

When I say cash, we were paying the interns a little bit, and the founders were not getting paid as much. So we wanted to have a livelihood. And out of the blue, someone came in and said, hey, we are actually building a product company, which we’re backup and recovery is just one of the elements to it.

Would you be willing to either partner or co-sell or get acquired, right? And we started, you know, opening our thoughts to it. And they essentially, you know, even before they talked, they actually sent us a letter of intent to go acquire. After that, it was acquired, and we started to get a little bit of revenue on a recurring basis.

The three of us would sit down alongside the interns. They actually did not take the team. They took our product and they built a team around it.

Got it. 

So we started with the IP around it. They acquired the IP, the product, all the code, you know, all of that.

So we were sitting around twiddling, hey, we are getting some money now. What do we do? And then, and we were working on small projects, you know, Accenture was there, Avanade was there, Microsoft was starting to get involved, AWS was starting to get involved. And then the AWS team actually proposed to us that, hey, you’re local here in Seattle.

We have about seven different large clients who are migrating there, you know, all their workloads in the data center to the cloud. We don’t promise you much, but could you become our solution architects? Be the front-facing, because you guys know much better than some of our solution architects. Could you actually go help with that? So they paid us handsomely.

And we went to T-Mobile. T-Mobile, you know, had about seven data centers at that time. And they asked us, how we migrate or rebuild into AWS. And AWS paid us, you know, for that work.

And then, then later T-Mobile said, hey, you know what? No, we will pay you. We want to accelerate. This is going too slowly.

So they started paying us. 

Okay. 

When I say paying us, we were on a 1099 contract.

We had no company. And then we decided, hey, you know what, let’s start a company.

So we registered for Avian at that time. And our first contact came in from AWS. It took us almost two and a half months to get registered as a partner of AWS.

And then T-Mobile, Safeway, Nordstrom, and a whole bunch of other things started happening. 

And did Avian focus mostly on solution services? 

On services. 

We were at that moment, we knew that cloud is the, you know, the next big thing.

Right. 

But we had no idea how a smallish company or a set of small folks could build a solution that can be relevant. So we started getting our hands and noses dirty, you know, by working, doing hands-on exercises, migrating it, running DevOps scripts, and all of that.

And almost a year and a half later, T-Mobile asked us that, hey, now you’ve built about seven applications in the cloud, we want to go production. And for that, we are inviting PwC and KPMG, two different products. We would want them to go to the security and compliance.

And we want to make sure that we will go live with these products being compliant. And they asked us, can you automate security? On a daily basis, run these scripts. And this is what the CIO told me.

Can you on a daily basis, run a script, which looks at all the issues, you know, on a security basis, work with these teams, I will give you some teams, you know, and you can hire your own team as well. Go fix it. And on an everyday basis, you report back to me that all of these are getting ready to be productionalized.

And they offered us $3 million. And I said, well, we actually went in and looked at if $3 million was too little or too much because there’s almost half a data center’s worth of applications were moved over to AWS. And we realized that there was not much margin in that it looked like large money, but we had to go build a team towards it.

We actually went back to T-Mobile at that time with a proposal: what if we build a SaaS product that you license, and we’ll take your $3 million now? But half of that will go to building the SaaS product. And we will give you the licensing fee for the next two years for that.

We need it in the next four months. If you build a SaaS product, it’s going to take more than nine to 12 months. And we’re not ready for it. 

So we went on Nordstrom came along, we had another contact with Nordstrom, they had a very similar request on Azure. Nordstrom was an Azure partner. And then we started seeing this over and over again. 

So we, you know, I decided that I’ll take a small, small team to actually productionalize, build a product, a SaaS product, and use it internally, right to do all of these things so that we can reduce the repeated pains that we would have. Yep. So we built it, we deployed it, we actually in T-Mobile actually gave us the consent to use it internally. 

And we actually use it internally. And then we trained a bunch of teams, you know, without actually selling anything, we had a services contract. And then we said that, hey, this portion of that is the IP of T-Mobile will not use it. 

But this portion of that is our IP. Yeah. And we will, we’ll take it out. 

We went to Microsoft, and Microsoft liked it. And they said, can you do this within Azure, Azure, Azure Security Center? 

Yeah. 

So they paid us, you know, about a million and a half to go build, you know, security policies and things like that within Azure. 

And they said, for that, you can build your product on top of the Policy Center, and we will go market it. 

Oh, wow. 

Right. 

And boom, we said, yep. Well, let’s go build, and register a company. So very cool. 

A lot of these things, I mean, one pattern I’m seeing is a lot of these like your startups, the exits are very natural. It’s not like you’re forcing, hey, I need to make a transition or the team needs to make a transition onto something else. It’s a natural evolution, all driven by customer demand. 

I mean, customers are asking for it or partners. 

I think that is my core belief as well, you know, which is why I think I mentioned to you early on if we were to go this in isolation, we’ll actually never build anything of this sort. We will have to sit down with people who are actually using or having pain, right, day in and day out.

Right. 

That has been my path, you know, until now. So I went ahead and built the company, and Microsoft invested in us. 

Deloitte risk advisory teams invested in us. And Microsoft actually got us the first 50 customers through their marketplace. So we were starting to get deployed at Walmart and various other large things. 

And our team was really under the pressure at that time, you know, or go to market was, was easier with partner-led.

Right!

But our product was not ready to scale for such large things. So Gartner told us, either go, you know, raise a lot of capital or get acquired. 

And we said, No, we can’t raise so much capital because or, you know, or what we are doing is about a million, million and a half. And if we were to do something of that sort, we would only raise about four to 5 million, right? That’s not sufficient, you know. So the term she thought that we got was about four to $6 million, you know, raise. 

And then suddenly, you know, we had seven different offers in 2019 from large network companies to acquire us. We said no to all of them. And we kept saying no to it about like five or six times, Zscaler came along and they told us to run it as a subsidiary. 

Think of it as a separate company. 

Yeah. 

Having these milestones, we will invest and we will own all of your IP in two years’ time and will transition after this particular milestone. 

And we said yes, that that made more sense. Other than just acquiring at an early stage that way. 

Very cool. 

And all that exists also happened naturally. I mean, just as you articulated, right, the buildup of the company, the startup services and products, as well as the exit, all of them happened naturally. It was a pull. 

It was a pull. Yeah, there was no, we never went out to raise capital, you know, outside of the fact that we need money. And Microsoft took us to M12, their own internal teams. 

And they say, based on what you currently have, we can actually you know, so even that was more of a pull.

Right! 

Because we essentially told no, we can’t scale to Walmart, you know, Walmart, the actual cost of running Walmart was about one and a half million dollars for us, just the product, hosting costs, to solve Walmart. And Microsoft said, hey, you can charge about four to $5 million to Walmart. And we can fund half of it. 

And, and, you know, and we said, yeah, we can do that. But we had to go build and accelerate the product towards that, right? So we had this push and pull and push and pull. And, you know, tear your hair apart at that time. 

But, you know, that was the case. 

And throughout this process, I mean, partner-led growth, as you articulated before, it’s always been a partner pull-like, you never sound like you never really have to build out a formal sales team, because your partners are doing all the selling on your behalf and co-marketing as well. 

Yeah, as a startup, yes. 

After we got acquired, you know, Zscaler was a 100% sales-led company. 

Sure. Yeah. 

And, and, you know, we got the, you know, we had to finetune ourselves to this kind of emotion, I was not really acquainted to, you know, hey, you know what, we’ll not talk to customers who would not pay us, you know, at least about $30,000. Correct. You know, I was always hungry, hey, even if you’re ready to pay 5k, you know, 3k, 4k, 5k, we will take you in, because I need the money. 

Yep. 

With Zscaler, it was like, well, our sales and marketing costs are so damn high, that there’s an opportunity cost of working with small customers.

Right?!

Or even if they’re large customers, if they’re ready to pay only like three to 5k, we won’t even take it, we will say no to them. 

Right. 

And that’s where I saw that sales-led motion was very expensive, expensive to build. It was also very linear, the more people that you would get, or you will add two quarters or three quarters later when you will see the return of investment, you will not see the return of investment within a quarter. So it has a lag time, right, you know, of getting the investments, you know, and even those would be half or one-third of the spend. 

Right. 

So the cost of acquisition was, you know, was a massive, you know, deal, which is why I got acquainted with this concept of, as Gary Olson from, from Harvard Business School, he keeps talking about growth at all costs. And I had a conversation with them. 

And then he ingrained in me that this is not going to work over a period of time, you know, profitability and growth need to all come together. Yeah. I started seeing, and I’ll probably even ask this to you, and you talked to a lot of GTM leaders out there as well. 

I see there’s a mix, you know, you can’t just do partner-led growth, you can’t just do sales-led growth. 

Right. 

You know, and definitely you can’t do, you know, product-led growth, you know, as its own single silo, or you will have to combine them together.

Have you seen that happen? You talked to a lot of GTM leaders out there as well. Do they mix them up? Y

eah. So from my own experience, as well as having spoken with leaders from big companies like Clary, Asana, and the likes, and even started like Y Combinator founders, it’s always been a combination, right? No one go-to-market motion really works by itself. 

It’s almost like you need to figure out your channel, make it work, and then layer on and add the next channel. And that’s what I’ve seen work well. Even though that is the intent, a lot of go-to-market leaders, again, it’s not in their hands completely. 

They need to spread and make sure that they’re laying the ground for the next, but at the same time, not lose focus on the sales-led. 

That’s what happened to me. I think I have an interesting story for your audience as well.

At Gscaler, we were a hundred percent sales-led. We would leave money on the table. If it is, you know, anything less than 30K ARR, the SEV deals we would, or the sales team would, you know, would say no to them and walk away. 

We started seeing smaller upstarts, started to build more like product-led motions, self-serve motions, and they were ready to take in a hundred dollars a month, $500 a month, you know, to begin. And then six months later, they will go three times the size or five times the size. And we got hit in, you know, in a quarter, pretty much in four months time, we lost about 17, 18 different prospects that we thought we could actually close. 

And they actually went to the smaller upstarts than us. That’s when, you know, leadership at Gscaler asked me, hey, could we actually layer a product-led growth motion on top of sales-led motion? I spent about like four months making that happen. And I failed at it.

I failed miserably at it. I spent, I’m guilty of, you know, of spending so much money without actually understanding how this motion actually works. I spent about a million, $1.2 million in building or rebuilding, refactoring the product for self-serve, helping coach or GTM teams, and, hey, you know, users will come. 

You had to go and talk to the companies, you know, and upsell them. Conceptually, it made more sense, but we had such a horrible pushback from the sales team. Our product was not ready to do something about that. 

So refactoring cost itself was about 750K, you know, for us to begin with. And then our sales team was like, hey, if this is self-serve revenue coming in, and it is like $1,000 or $2,000, why do you want me to be part of it? To build your own team towards the self-serve motions. So it was like getting squished between a rock and a hard place. 

I have actually not seen a successful product-led growth motion layered on top of a successful sales-led growth motion. That has been my, you know, my bigger appeal, which is why I’m building, you know, ThriveStack, you know, to essentially enable and straddle between those two, PLG and SLG, start with really PLG, and then being able to go and expand it with human-led expansion. 

Absolutely. 

I mean, in fact, the story that you shared, thank you for sharing that story. That’s really critical. The reason why I say that is, that it actually reminded me of my own experience when I was hired at a CSP startup to lead product-led growth. 

And the CPO and the CEO at that time, they were like, they were selling with inside sales, selling to small businesses at about $1,000 ACD or so. And then they did a little experiment, and then they were able to channel and drive individual users to product-led growth. And that’s when they’re quote-unquote convinced that we can start adding product-led growth. 

But when I got in there and started looking under the hood and looking into all the details, that’s when I started realizing product-led growth is a good, attractive magnet. I mean, it’s almost like a trend or it’s like the thing that people want to latch on to the next big wave, if you will. But it’s an entirely different mindset and a different mindset that has to be adopted across the leadership team first will also mean making sacrifices on who you’re going to serve and on the sales team.

And I mean, you have to go, you are absolutely right. You have to get away from the mindset that you’re only selling to the buyers. It really starts from there, you know, that your users, you’re serving to the users. 

You are building the product in such a way that the users are benefiting, you know, from the very get-go, rather than selling it, you know, top-down, this becomes a bottom-up motion. It’s a very different mindset. You’re absolutely right.

Yeah. Some of the really successful companies that have done superbly well are Zoom, Slack, Dropbox, and Dropbox, they’re still more individual. But the key thing is, that they go all in and start, they have the DNA of a PLG first. 

And then once they start seeing within an account, there are like 10-15 users, then they layer on the sales-led on top, talking to the top layer saying, Hey, by the way, did you know that like 5-10 of your team members are doing it? Let’s now talk at the account level versus the user level. 

Yeah. I think, let me make a prediction, you know, based on what you just said.

In 5-10 years time, all the large sales-led companies, you know, they’re anyways getting stagnant at this moment, the growth, you know, growth is tapering down, you know, they are growing, you know, high, you know, high single digit, you know, too low, you know, double-digit growth for most of them. I would imagine that if you take a very similar set of products, a very similar set of things, make a copy of that, from a concept standpoint, but build it like a self-serve motion, and compete with them, you’ll actually win. Yeah. 

And I’m seeing that happen in the cloud security space. Right. You know, they’re getting outcompeted, you know, with smaller upstarts. 

I’ve seen that happen in the financial or fintech space. I’m seeing that happen in healthcare tech, in edu tech, across the board, you take the bigger piece, and you compete with them with a product-led growth motion. Because the bigger company will not be able to change their DNA, the smaller company can actually accelerate with product-led and then add sales, you know, to grow much faster. 

So it’s very likely that over a period of time, we will have a world where end users become the king rather than selling a top-down, end users will now have a choice to go pick the problem that they have, pick the solution out there, get started, and then over a period of time, latch on to do more things. 

Yeah. 

And I see that that future is coming much faster than what we could imagine. 

Yeah, sure. And product-led growth, for all its promises, as well as the pitfalls that it has, definitely is still a very attractive go-to-market motion. And I was in talks with this company. 

I don’t know. Yeah, they were primarily product-led growth. And we use them. 

Oh, there you go. So. So when I was talking to a couple of the go-to-market leadership folks over there, they were explaining their primarily product-led growth. 

The majority of them are small to medium businesses across different functions. And they’re figuring they’re still figuring out the right ways to layer on the same. Yeah, yeah. 

I think that’s the market. Layering on sales-led motions or human-led expansion, I generally start to call it that way. You already have a pipeline, you have a pipeline of customers who are using your product, and they’re already paying you. 

Yeah. 

This is no different than the sales team going and saying, hey, you know what, this is a land deal for 30k, 40k. Next year, we’ll talk to you for 100k. 

Right. And you can expand towards that. 

Yeah. 

It’s just that in this case, in the case of product-led, the deal size might be a lot smaller. So you’ll have to fine-tune your upsell strategy. So hey, these are the things that you’re using. 

These are the things that you’re not using. You know, and this is an enterprise deal, an organization-wide deal. And we’ll give this to you. 

So the upsell motion becomes a lot easier with product-led than with sales-led, which is why I see a path, you know, in the future. Why is ClickUp being successful? Why is Canva being successful? Why is Figma being successful? Not just in entering the user market, and the users are essentially the prosumer buyers, but they’re also able to go and attract larger enterprises and do larger deals. 

Right. 

So Calendly is doing larger deals with large sales organizations. Figma is doing large deals with larger companies. It’s not just one license, two licenses. 

They’re selling, you know, 150, 300 licenses at once, add AI on top of it, and they’re able to upmarket it. So I think that’s a natural way to do it. The converse, on the other hand, is actually very difficult. 

If you’re a sales-led motion, it’s extremely difficult. In fact, it’s almost impossible to layer on PLG. I don’t see companies being able to do that.

And here is why. I mean, I’m talking about it from a firsthand experience that I shared earlier with the Series B startup. And here is why, right? I mean, first of all, if you are inside sales or sales led overall, the way the product is designed, the way the buyers are, quote, unquote, educated to use your product, or even be aware of your product is one way. 

It’s a path A, let’s say A, versus if you were to design a product-led growth from the ground up, the way you’re going to think about how the user will be, first of all, aware of your product, how will they convert from a free trial signup to activation to purchase? It has to be all self-serve, and self-driven for the most part. So you’ll be designing your content, you’ll be designing your features, you’ll be designing your dashboard. So UI and UX will be completely different. 

And there’ll also be a viral effect, a network effect that has been built in ideally. That’s an entirely different thought process in the DNA compared to a sales-led. one 

And not just that, I’ve experienced this firsthand, which is why I’m building the infrastructure for ThriveStack around enabling product-led motion from the very start. 

So tenant creation, in the sales-led world, tenants are being created by the sales guys sending a note to the operations team, hey, go ahead and create this tenant. For a B2B SaaS company, you’d have to automate the tenant creation. I’ve seen, and I’ve talked to many of the companies, the number of signups, fairly outshines the number of conversions, almost to 9x. 

90% of the signups do not convert. Forget to convert, 90% of the signups do not even activate.

Yeah, exactly.

So you’ll have to go build a cleanup process that, hey, you know what, there are so many signups that are coming in and the signups will happen. Most of them will be abandoned. They will go start something if they don’t find any value. 

Nobody will go ahead and say, hey, please cancel my account. They just abandon and then go away. So cleanup on a B2B SaaS is major. 

Abuse is predominant. And I’ve seen, and I talked to one of the prosumer companies, one of the B2B SaaS companies who went product-led, they had 60% or 57% of the signups that were happening were all malicious. Either coming in from fake domains, you know, people are just, you know, they could be competitors. 

They could be somebody else. They could be bots. They want to go look at what you have built, you know, so these signups are coming in. 

These domains are from inboxes, which are temporary.

Right.

They are also duplicates. For example, vj at abc.com is the same as vj plus one at abc.com. So all of these things, I would factor them as the baseline self-serve infrastructure. Also add the product analytics to it. 

Also, add along the signals associated with who’s using the enrichment. So I see that if product-led growth has to become a mainstay, all the growth tools are there in the market, which are just on the GTM side, like even enrichment, lead management, all of that, they all need to shift left. They all need to be inside the product now. 

They should enable the product in order to become a lot more self-servable. So I see, you know if we combine the baseline infrastructure and what you mentioned as the UX associated, the dashboards are different. Onboarding is different. 

There’s a UX part of it, and there’s an infrastructure part of it. I think both of them should go hand in hand, which is why I think it’s extremely difficult to do both of them together, like sales-led motion and product-led motion together. Yeah, absolutely. 

I know we can go on and on on several of these topics, right? But just doing a quick time check, I think we covered a lot of ground here. Just moving on to the closing section of the podcast, like, I think you did answer this in many ways, like what resources or communities or people have shaped and helped in your overall growth? I think meeting and talking to prospects is one of the biggest learnings for me. 

Yeah, I listen to a lot of podcasts. You know, on weekends, I’m a very early riser. So, you know, from 5, 5.30 in the morning, you know, get some of the chores done, and I’m listening, especially on the weekends, I’ll be listening to one and a half to two hours of podcast, and I whiteboard. I’ll just scribble off things and then take off my mind. 

I do attend, you know, and sometimes I speak at various industry events and throw out an idea that, hey, this is possible. And then look at the reaction. I’m looking at, you know, whether people are agreeing to it, disagreeing to it. 

And I do the same and somebody speaking, I actually go and talk to them, say, hey, you’re right or wrong, you know, and express my opinion, regardless of whether that opinion is good or bad. 

Yeah, 

I’ll get something out of it. So I’ve been an active learner for quite some time on that particular front. 

I’ll probably leave it at that. Very cool. And then the final question to you is if you were to turn back the clock and go back to day one of your go-to-market journeys, what advice would you give to your younger self? That’s a very interesting question. 

So don’t build a product. If you don’t understand the problems, it’s a lot better. In my younger days, I would think about a solution.

And I would try to retrofit what the problem is. But I think that’s wrong. I would go tell my younger self, if you have 10 hours of time, spend about eight to nine hours of time just understanding the problem, not the solution, the solution will come out of the problem very soon. 

I think the second thing I’ll probably tell, you know, myself is to understand the problem, talk to at least 30 4050 odd folks who are actually experiencing that problem. They may not necessarily pay you, right? And don’t go behind them to say that, I have a solution to sell, you know, I think you have a problem, you know, go ahead and buy my solution. It’s probably a bad, a bad approach, you know, get in bed with them, if you can, on the problem space, right? 

And I’ve seen that a lot more successful. And every single time I’ve put my seller mode, or have my team go sell, sell, sell, I’ve seen that the market pushes back. But when I talk about, hey, this is the problem.

And these are the potential solutions. How are you doing it today? What pains do you currently have and that just opens the door. We had a conversation yesterday. 

And then I essentially, asked one of the founders who’s in Germany, how do you currently do it today? And like, hey, I take this, I take this, I do this and this. What if, you know, instead of me presenting a solution, this was readily available? Let’s say, these six things that you mentioned, there is a solution, right? How will your life be? And then suddenly, like, do you think that’s available? I said, Well, let’s assume that it’s available, right? And it opens up doors, it opens up conversations, it opens up a lot of trust. So I would, I would teach myself over and over again, harp on the problem, not on the solution. 

And then focus on building trust in the problem, not the solution. 

Absolutely. I mean, that actually reminds me and brings to my mind, something that I want to share with the listeners as well as I put together a thesis around a new offer. 

And then I approached it with Hey, is this even valid with my buyer ICPs? And lo and behold, I took a similar approach, which is here are the different problem statements. Do any of these resonate with you? They said yes, and then added more to it. And in the next, I said, Okay, imagine this solution exists.

Would it resonate or will it work in your environment? Yeah, they said yes. And if you were to build a business case, how would you build a business case? 

Yeah, 

That naturally leads them to a Hey, by the way, you know what, I’m in need of this right now. Can we talk? 

Yeah, yeah. 

I think, you know, you know, one-on-one conversation is actually very difficult. In a one to many conversations actually a lot easier, which is why industry conferences, events, you know, are, are actually the better way to sell, you know, than essentially sit down in a one-on-one conversation talking about, you know, like a cold call, I get a lot of cold calls, you know, my inbox gets filled, my email, my LinkedIn, you know, gets filled with almost 150 plus cold emails every single day. Yeah, right. 

And when I look into that, all of them are selling the solution, nobody’s really talking about the problem. But I think that that thing is going to become more problematic. Today, I see 150. 

And maybe a year later, also, I’ll probably see about 3000 4000 cold emails or cold calls like that. I don’t know the answer to that. That doesn’t work for me. 

I get spammed a lot. When I think about if I have to go build an AiSDR team to be able to do exactly the same things. You know, I’m very hesitant about that part of it. 

So you’re absolutely right. But it is not scalable. Exactly. 

That, you know, on a, on a one on one basis, my evolution to the next step of GTM is how can I do what you just said? Yeah. But, you know, 1000 a day, right? 10,000 a day? 

Yeah. Yeah. 

And, you know, and if there’s any solution there out there to all the listeners as well, reach out to me, I’ll leave my email ID, you know, down there. 

Yeah, that’s a solid note, in terms of how we wrap up this podcast, which is how we started. Again, going back to the key notion, GTM is constantly evolving. 

Right? 

In our case, it’s the last example, which is how do I evolve this GTM motion to now automate and scale! So I’ll stop on that.